CONTENT: (1) Analysis of the stream (with numerical references to specific parts of the stream transcript) (2) Stream transcript (3) Conclusions (1) ANALYSIS: ELIRA: The point of the video was to justify Selen's termination (2.) allegedly from the perspective of the EN livers (1.). However what they said in this stream was approved by a legal team and ANYCOLOR (3. 4.). Point 4. includes a caveat that comes across as an oxymoron "approved by lawyers OR is based solely on our personal experience", this sentence was most likely requested by the lawyers as a means to protect ANYCOLOR at the expense of the three livers. This is particularly obvious given that in the entirety of this stream no effort was made to clarify which part of their speech was "approved by lawyers" and which was "based solely on their personal experience", simply meaning the the whole stream was approved and structured by a legal team. Specially considering how high this situation escalated and their degree of coordination (5.). They can try decorating reality insisting that they are using their own words and "feelings" (6.), but the fact remains. Elira followed with an apology in case her silence on the matter had caused the general audience to worry (7.). As innocuous as that statement seems to be at first glance, it is disconnected from reality. There was absolutely no expectation that Elira had to pronounce herself on this matter and much less her silence regarding it was no source of concern for anyone. Because it is common practice in ANYCOLOR that when a liver is terminated either everyone remains silent or a few mostly close to him (which Elira was not with Selen) somehow justify ANYCOLOR’s decision. This is another indicator this stream was manufactured by lawyers, trying to create the illusion that it was the product of the liver’s feelings; since it might sound nice and appropriate but it is detached from the general audience/streamer experience. Furthermore, both Vox and Mike will not apologize for their silence as Elira did, yet the three of them have the exact same reasons to do so (which are pretty lacking). This just shows that this stream was a simple structured script; with a beginning, middle part and end. But also ANYCOLOR’s legal team attributing this responsibility to Elira, might suggest that from their perspective she holds some sort of position of authority. So after making it obvious that their speech was the machination in disguise of ANYCOLOR’s legal team, Elira will go on to describe some parts of the document. Elira starts pointing out that the documents contained examples of Selen’s claimed "experiences" under ANYCOLOR (8.) Experiences which later for the most can only be inferred as either examples of staff favoritism (39.) or bullying from other livers (31.). Elira followed saying that those documents included personal information of some livers (9.). If we consider the succession of statements from point 8. to 9., we could conclude that some of the examples of claimed experiences by Selen under ANYCOLOR included personal information of some livers who were part of said experiences, experiences that mostly were either examples of staff favoritism (39.) or bullying from other livers (31.). Meaning that necessarily at the very least, some of the livers whose personal information was included in the documents were among Selen’s claimed bullies. Elira continues providing an excuse for ANYCOLOR giving access to the documents to some of the livers. ANYCOLOR’s legal team informed them that there was the possibility that the information in those documents could be made public (10.), which included the personal information of some of the livers (9.), of which some of it Elira claimed poses a risk to their personal safety and some of which puts some of them at risk of doxing (11.). Elira will continue highlighting a section in those documents as "notable" as it "alludes" to where Elira, Enna and Millie live (12.). Elira will go on to say: "HOWEVER THERE ARE ALSO HARMFUL CLAIMS", she is talking about some livers personal information described in that document that they "believe" are untrue (13.). To summarize so far, Selen’s claimed experiences (8.) contained personal information of some of the livers (9.); some of this personal information poses a risk to their safety (11.), puts some of them at risk of doxing (11.) or are apparently slanderous (13). But one has to wonder, what was the need to specifically reference the case in common for Elira, Enna and Millie by mentioning them. Considering that the main point of this part of the stream was not only justifying ANYCOLOR giving access to the livers to these documents, but by doing so using said livers to portrait Selen in a very negative light by stating through them that she included as part of her described experiences in those documents (8.) (which could potentially be made public (10.)) claims which put some livers at risk (11.) or that are slanderous (13.); it makes sense that they would at least reference the cases which pose a risk to some livers personal safety. The point I am trying to make here is that Enna, Millie and Elira’s case is notably exceptional and likely to be the only case where the livers personal safety might be at risk (if their addresses are doxed through this document). Otherwise, why not reference other livers that might find themselves in a similar dangerous situation? Or at the very least provide a description of said situation? What does make Elira, Enna and Millie special, for them to be showcased in this way, if not the particular severity of their mention in the document? But instead Elira jumps from this "notable" section to the "there are ALSO harmful claims Selen made in the document about SOME LIVER'S PERSONAL INFORMATION that WE BELIEVE are simply untrue" (13.), so this is likely to be exclusively the case for all the other livers mentioned in that document or at most soft doxing (more innocuous than what can be found through a simple Google search). The wording in point 13. is also interesting, why not categorically say that some of Selen’s claims were untrue, instead of "believing" to be untrue. If Selen is claiming inaccuracies about their personal information, it should be straight forward for them to call them false. But instead they add this subjective qualifier "believe". So either those livers did not have access to the document, which would be a massive contradiction with the justification ANYCOLOR is trying to give to itself here, or the veracity of Selen’s harmful claims is more a matter of perception that would require further argumentation. For example, personal information like addresses or names even if fake for most cases cannot be qualified as "harmful claims"; instead a harmful claim would be something like accusing someone of pedophilia, but for such a case categorically denying it is what makes sense. Why give yourself that "believe to be untrue" leeway in the face of a harmful claim? The answer is in the true nature of this stream, a script written by Japanese lawyers. These "harmful claims from Selen" must be a reference to her claims of experienced harassment from other livers, or to put it like Vox would later say "IN MY OPINION I DO NOT THINK THAT IT WAS A FORM OF HARASSEMENT" (37.). Selen’s harmful claims were likely accusing some livers of being bullies (31.); a label attributed to your personality, from which they probably did the "personal information" leap in point 13. For example, claiming that Aster Arcadia is a creep is a personal claim that can be qualified as harmful, however it might not be categorically denied if such claim is backed with personal experiences which are part of what is described in a document handed by a lawyer. For such case, it would be more convenient for a third party (ANYCOLOR’s legal team) give itself leeway by saying something like "we believe such harmful claim is untrue". But regardless if the claim is true or false, calling someone a "creep" is harmful and this again points out to a legal Japanese mindset. I would like to further analyze the notable case of Elira, Enna and Millie (12.). At the very least it is a unique case in which addresses are alluded. Selen is either talking about 3 specific addresses, 3 general locations or a single common general location, but given Elira’s fear (14.) it must have been the first alternative. Also keep in mind that Selen is describing experiences that mostly were either examples of staff favoritism (39.) or bullying from other livers (31.). We will later learn from Vox that some livers would reach out to Selen to question her about some tweets they considered "harmed them as a group" (15. 23. 24. 25. 26. 29.), but for most livers this would obviously be done through digital means (27. 28.) such as twitter and discord because of geographical limitations. Many of their complains would be considered by Selen as harassment (30. 31.). Then why are Elira’s, Enna’s and Millie’s addresses alluded in that document? Well for starters, Selen, Elira, Enna and Millie live in the proximity within a general area, meaning visiting each other does not require a major investment. So in the context of what is being discussed in the stream, unlike other livers involved; at some point Elira, Enna and Millie must have managed to reach Selen with their complains through physical means. It is in this scenario that alluding exclusively to their addresses makes sense. Therefore, we can be certain that whatever complain Elira, Enna and Millie had about Selen, they brought it to her face at least once, experience that Selen must have considered an act of harassment. Because for them and their addresses to be part of Selen’s document, it can only mean that from Selen’s perspective Elira, Enna and Millie were among the livers who bullied her. Elira continued saying that she felt threatened and scared of speaking out about the situation (14.), but as it was mentioned before nobody in the general audience had the expectation, much less was worried because of Elira’s silence regarding Selen’s termination. This is just too unrealistic and to bring it up for the second time (7.) just shows it was not a spontaneous idea. Just to reiterate, what makes Elira special? Why is this not the case for everyone else specially Selen’s gen mates Petra and Rosemi or all other livers mentioned in the document (unless the only livers qualified as bullies in that document were Elira, Enna, Millie, Vox and Mike)? If anything, there was expectation to know Petra and Rosemi’s opinion on the matter of Selen’s termination. The answer again is, because this stream was a device structured by ANYCOLOR and its lawyers. From here there is a mayor shift in the focus of Elira’s speech, which will be followed by Vox in much more detail (a script transition if you will). Elira brings up Selen’s tweet about her cover being private, which caused several livers to reach to her and express their concern (15.), Elira reiterates their genuine concern and ignorance on the matter in point 16. The emphasis on their "genuine concern" goes beyond a esthetic choice, because we will soon learn from Vox that Selen would qualify those actions as harassment (28. 29. 30. 31). It is also as interesting Elira’s last part of that sentence, "we were all in the dark about it". This statement has also a clear purpose, to ensure that staff had no part on it, as in "reaching to Selen was not requested by staff" or more accurately "we were not provided neither information nor instructions on the matter from staff, we were in the dark". In the same fake spirit of Millie’s infamous "did you received a confirmation/OK sign to manesan before uploading this cover?" tweet. If Selen is being trustful about her bullying experience, what we are evidencing is a sinister and hypocritical pattern of behaviour from some of the livers (like Elira and Millie), who will make seemingly friendly public statements while simultaneously viciously harassing behind private messages. Elira ends addressing Selen’s hospitalization, which includes a compulsory accessory, claiming to care for Selen’s safety (17.). According to Elira, Selen informed all the livers about her situation (18.), which at first would come across as a contradiction; why inform people among who are your bullies about your attempt? The reason is Selen’s work ethics, those people are also her coworkers and at least she had a collab planned, it was just natural for her to announce her unavailability. The confirmation of this in in point 17. when Elira said "Once she notified ALL OF US regarding her hospitalization, WE immediately reached out to her"; Selen NOTIFIED them about her hospitalization yet they IMMEDIATELY REACHED OUT to her. The duality "notification/ immediately reaching out" implies that Selen made them aware of their situation in a formal non personal manner, likely through a third person or a single message in a common discord group, the same way someone indisposed would notify their coworkers. VOX: Vox opens saying that his purpose in the stream is to talk about his experiences with Selen to provide context for the audience (20.). He then makes an odd request, to take what he will describing at face value (21.). What Vox says about providing experiences with what would be proper context, must be contrasted with Elira’s part which focused on Selen’s own described experiences in the documents (8.) by character assassinating her by claiming that those described experiences contained dangerous (11.) and slanderous (13.) information. Vox will now speak to the audience at the same level Selen did in those documents, through experiences but his it is to be understood will provide non harmful and true context. Yet he will not produce evidence of his claimed experiences with Selen (unlike she probably did in her document), ergo the face value request. But to give more weight to his claimed experiences with Selen, he will later portrait himself as Selen’s friend and confident (32. 44.). Next he will go on to talk about Selen’s private cover situation, while presenting censored and cherry-picked screenshots between Selen and staff discussing about it; he will use them to justify staff decision to private the cover and to show that Selen did not act properly and that her tweet on the matter did not provide the correct context (22). Vox will go on to try characterize the case he just described as a common pattern of behavior for Selen, "It is very important to establish THIS PATTERN OF EVENTS HAVE HAPPENED BEFORE ON MULTIPLE OCASSIONS", by listing other cases he considers fall under that pattern (Selen’s Fall Guys tournament in August 20233, her voice pack in May of the same year and an outfit contest also in May) (23.). After announcing his will to establish a common pattern of behavior for Selen and listing other cases which would fall under said pattern, Vox proceeds to describe the pattern he is trying to expose: "Selen would be working on one of the projects I have mentioned, she would be given clear communication about confirming certain aspects with STAFF all other livers receive and comply with and EACH TIME SHE WOULD REFUSE TO COOPERATE and when STAFF WOULD REACT APPROPIETLY she would make PUBLIC STATEMENTS THAT WOULD HURT ANYCOLOR'S REPUTATION" (24.). So regarding staff interactions with Selen in the listed (all controversial) cases, not only Vox claims that staff reacted properly when dealing with Selen’s alleged refusal to cooperate, but that staff provided her clear communication about confirmation procedures and also that those procedures are the same all other livers receive and follow, this last part is a necessary statement in this script since later Vox will mention that Selen was aiming in the document to prove instances of staff favoritism with other livers (39). But why would Vox qualify the need to establish this pattern of behavior as "very important" (23.)? For three reasons, to refute Selen’s claim that there was bias from staff (39.), to justify Selen’s termination as she kept hurting ANYCOLOR’s reputation (24.) and for what will be Vox’s next line of argumentation, justifying the livers who reached out to Selen because of those incidents (15. 16. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 37.) actions which Selen characterized in the document as instances of bullying (30. 31.). Vox will go on to claim that what he just described as Selen’s pattern of behavior (24.), made him and other livers very upset, anxious (25.) and feel that it harmed them as group (26. ) and this is the context that Vox uses to justify him and some other livers approaching Selen (27.) to ask her about the reasons for tweeting about the private cover the way she did (28.), while telling her that such action was unnecessary and harmful (29.). What we are being told here is that within the livers there was a group (28.), which in a coordinated fashion complained at Selen for her tweet about the private cover. We can tell it was done in a coordinated way because Vox is able to list not only the reasons (hurts ANYCOLOR’s reputation (24.) makes them very upset and anxious (25.) and harms them as a group (26.)) to do so but also the common content of that group’s complains: asking Selen why she tweeted about that issue (28.) the way she did, and telling her doing so was unnecessary and harmful (29.). Although not necessarily the case, all or most of the livers in that group, might have reached Selen simultaneously (27.) by using for example a common Discord server; try picturing an "intervention" of sorts. It was the previously described event (some livers complaining at Selen for her tweet about the private cover (27. 28.)), which would be the last straw for Selen to decide to complain about being bullied and harassed by other livers as her lawyer mentioned in the documents (30. 31.). Meaning that this was probably one of the worst bullying experiences from Selen’s perspective; this can also be inferred from what Vox says in some parts of his script, which suggests there was an escalation on the severity of their complains towards Selen (25. 36.). Vox then mentions his alleged friendship with Selen and the support he allegedly gave her in private (32.); which in the current topic of discussion, comes across as some sort of personal deflection from what likely were accusations in the document that included him as part of Selen’s bullies. Vox then jumps back on topic, claiming himself and other livers (most likely the ones accused as bullies and harassers, as those seemingly are the ones ANYCOLOR justified to give access to the documents (9. 10. 11. 12. 13.)) to vehemently BELIEVE Selen’s accusations of bullying and harassment (against them) to be COMPLETELY UNTRUE (34.), they base that claim on two things: Vox’s THOROUGHFUL REVIEW OF THE DOCUMENTS sent to ANYCOLOR by Selen’s lawyer (33.) and Vox’s personal knowledge and the one provided by Selen as product of their alleged friendship (34.). As a side note, Vox’s THOROUGHFUL review of documents send by a lawyer (this is the kind of thing one would expect only a lawyer would say) and at the same time using his personal knowledge and "friendship" with Selen to justify a claim (33. 34.), feels like an echo of what was said at the beginning of this stream, regarding its content being approved by lawyers OR is based solely on the livers personal experience (4.). Vox continues saying that therefore he is confident that they way himself and other livers complained with Selen about her tweet on the private cover was not harassment (37.), but was actually fair and reasonable (35.), but he follows this with a caveat, "ESPECIALLY CONSIDERING OUR BUILTUP ANXIETY OVER THIS REPEATING PATTERN OF BEHAVIOUR" (36.). Not only Vox is outing himself as one of Selen’s claimed bullies (35. 37); but once again we have confirmation from him that at least their complain about Selen’s private cover tweet was a coordinated effort between him and other livers (it is also possible to make the reasonable assumption that most of them reached her simultaneously). Otherwise, why express such confidence on the content and way other people communicated with Selen (35.) in the context of what is described in a document handed by a lawyer representing Selen as an instance of bullying, which will build up to Selen’s attempt? Next, for Vox to talk about BUILTUP ANXIETY OVER HIS PERCIEVED REPEATING PATTERN OF BEHAVIOUR from Selen (36.), not only suggests a escalation of the severity of his group’s complains towards Selen as "her pattern of behavior" kept repeating (25.); but also implies that their complains were not friendly, which is the reason why Vox mentions that "built up anxiety" as context to characterize his group’s complains as not a form of harassment (37.) but fair and reasonable (34.). Vox’s next topic on his script will cover Selen’s claim of staff/manager bias. Just like Vox opened describing Selen’ private cover issue (22.) to use it as a starting point to talk about Selen’s accusation of being bullied by some livers; Vox will mention Selen recording him in secret as part of what was mentioned in the document, (38.) to jump into her claims of STAFF SHOWING FAVORITISM FOR SOME MEMBERS OVER OTHERS (39.). This recording seems to be also pivotal for this claim, since according to Vox the recording was used to prove staff bias since self-admittedly Vox mentioned that he was not reprehended by staff for an inappropriate tweet (39.) as opposed to Selen’s "harmful" tweets (public statements) (24.). Vox will say that the reason for not being reprehended for that tweet (they did not even reach him out) was to avoid further controversy (40.). But that was not an isolated event of inappropriate tweets from him, as he goes on to say that he has been asked to delete OTHER TWEETS on MULTIPLE OCCASSIONS, yet he includes the caveat of claiming that those were the product of "ACCIDENTALLY" BREAKING A RULE (41.). That last caveat is necessary as he needs to avoid being compared to Selen’s so called pattern of behavior which included "harmful" tweets, since Vox’s self-admittedly has also broken the rules in multiple occasions with his tweets, but in his case he claims to be the product of accidents (41.). Still I am sure with the tweet sample, it should also be possible to establish a pattern of behaviour regarding Vox’s inappropriate tweets. Regardless, Vox just has demonstrated that there is FAVORITISM FOR SOME MEMBERS OVER OTHERS with his previous statement, as in his case although breaking the rules in MULTIPLE occasions with his tweets, he was ASKED to delete them (41.); yet in Selen’s case her inappropriate early tweets (May 2023) caused for her to be also severely reprehended (warned) by staff (48.). Vox will continue describing what he claims is his experience with Selen in the context of her disagreements with staff and her managers (43. 44.). Vox goes on to say that "leaving Nijisanji is always an option FOR LIVERS" (45.). The point that Vox seems to be trying to make is that, had Selen really wanted to graduate (as she told other livers in multiple occasions (46.)) she could have done so, specially since SHE WAS GIVEN VERY MANY CHANCES TO DO SO AMICABLY (44. 45.). But one has to wonder, in what context was Selen GIVEN VERY MANY CHANCES TO GRADUATE "AMICABLY"; for starters those chances are to be given at least manager level (if not higher), but also why offer Selen so many chances to quit ANYCOLOR? At the very least, it is cleat that there was the desire at some level from ANYCOLOR to end their business relation with Selen before the private cover incident. So if there was already the interest from ANYCOLOR’s side to end their business relation with Selen, why not graduate her? Because graduation requires a consensual agreement between both parties, so the amicable part Vox mentioned (45.), goes by default when graduating, it is nothing special under that procedure. But as we are being told, Selen would always back pedal from her will to graduate (46.). There is also the option of termination, which is pretty much at ANYCOLOR’s discretion. But from the public perception Selen was a well behaved liver (no foul language, no controversial topics, no drama with other livers and kept mostly to her gaming), who also had a well established and growing devote fan base. ANYCOLOR could have terminated her listing the same troublesome events Vox did (23. 24.), but for the wider audience Selen was in the right and victimized in most of them (her outfit contest was the clearest case). Terminating someone as popular as Selen under those excuses would have been a PR disaster for ANYCOLOR (48.) (as it will be demonstrated in 2024). So this left ANYCOLOR with a single viable option to get rid of Selen, graduation (unless at some point in the future she made a blatant mistake). What follows is mostly speculation on my part, but if we take into account the following circumstances: ANYCOLOR offered Selen very many chances to graduate (45.), ANYCOLOR likely wanted to get rid of Selen because the "damage" she kept causing to their reputation (24.), some livers were told by Selen in multiple occasions that she planned to graduate (46. 47.), in particular Vox was told by Selen about her issues with staff and management (43.), at least once Vox backed Selen’s decision to graduate (43. 49.), staff/management had a bias against Selen (39. 41. 48), there were livers harassing Selen because of her public statements "damaging" ANYCOLOR’s reputation (27. 28. 29. 30. 37) and some of those livers took the harassment to her physical proximity (12.). If we combine all these elements, the picture that forms here is of ANYCOLOR inserting pressure through staff, management and some livers to try to force Selen to graduate or commit an error that could justify them to terminate her. The carrot and stick, on one hand staff is offering her very many chances to graduate (45.), while her "friends" advice her to do so (43. 49.); but in the other hand staff and management becomes more restrictive regarding permissions (41. 48.) and the bullying from some livers kept getting worse (12. 25. 26. 36.). This was a pernicious cycle that was likely fed by people like Vox, who while pretending to be Selen’s confident (43. 46. 47.), would leak her increasing desire to graduate to staff, which would motivate them to increase the pressure as they would receive positive feedback that what they are doing to Selen was working, and it was just a matter of time to finally "break" her (which they did, but not in the way they expected). Back on track, Vox will highlight that back on May 2023, Selen told other livers that she was being terminated, but he will go on to clarify that she was JUST WARNED BY STAFF DUE TO HER REPEATED RULE BREAKAGES (48.). Notice how Vox does not clarify the content of said warning, what was the warning even about? Could it have been something like "continue damaging ANYCOLOR’s reputation and you will force us to TERMINATE you"; Listening to that from the perspective of someone who believed staff had a bias against her (39.) would be a confirmation that she was getting terminated sometime in the future, as staff would be the one fabricating the very same reason to terminate her (just as from her perspective, staff fabricated the reasons to produce that same warning (23.)). Vox will go on to qualify Selen’s ANYCOLOR bias "narrative" as HALF OR UNTRUTHS (49) and (OMITTED CONTEXT AND FALSEHOODS) (50.). The fact that Vox talks about half truths (49.) and omitted context (50.) in the same line of mentioning Selen being warned in May 2023 (48.), suggests that she was indeed warned with termination from ANYCOLOR back then. As the final part in his script, just like Elira’s, Vox goes on to virtue signal about Selen’s attempt (52.). and claims himself and other livers prayed and still pray for her safety (53.) (regardless of how they feel because of the "damage" she caused to him and his fellow livers (51.)). However, the closest thing to those "prayers" the audience has seen would be snarky tweets (like Reimu’s and Enna’s) or snarky comments during stream from a few livers (like Kyo, Enna and Maria) or absolute silence from most. MIKE: Mike must be understood as the closing act of the script, he does not bring anything of substance (54. 56.), but his function is to highlight a point that was previously addressed, but seems to be of particular interest for ANYCOLOR to bring to the public opinion: Selen’s document contains some incorrect, potentially harmful for some livers information, which the livers find terrifying (55.) (this was already addressed by Elira (9. 10. 11. 13. 14)). Mike ends the script saying: "WITHIN Nijisanji EN everyone always makes an effort to make sure that everyone who wants to be INCLUDED IN SOMETHING has the opportunity to do so, whether that be online or OFFLINE" (57.). Which seems to imply that in Selen’s document there were also complains about she being isolated by staff and some livers. But also for what we know from this very stream, for Selen that offline "something" also included offline harassment (12.). (2) STREAM TRANSCRIPT: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o65VwnQvWW4 1. Video title: a message *FROM* NIJISANJI EN Elira: 2. Goal to address the events surrounding Selen Tatsuki's termination (0:28) 3. We have discussed with ANYCOLOR STAFF and OUR LEGAL TEAM about what we are able to say (0:38) 4. Everything that will be discussed has been APPROVED BY LAWYERS OR IS BASED SOLELY ON OUR PERSONAL EXPERIENCE (1:00) 5. Additionally, we have been told that there will also be a video releasing regarding the situation from Tasumi San directly a few hours following this stream (1:30) 6. But what we say in this stream is our own words and our own feelings (1:39) 7. I would like to first apologize if my silence on the matter has caused any worry (1:45) 8. Over that past month staff received documents from Selen's lawyer containing examples of her claimed experiences under ANYCOLOR (1:50) 9. These documents in question included personal information of SOME livers (1:59) 10. And when it was sent to US, WE learned that there was A POTENTIAL that this information could be made public (2:04) 11. SOME of the information poses a RISK TO OUR personal safety and put SOME OF US at risk of doxing (2:09) 12. NOTABLY ONE SECTION of this document alludes to WHERE MILLIE, ENNA and I LIVE (2:16) 13. However there are also HARMFUL CLAIMS Selen made in the document about SOME LIVER'S PERSONAL INFORMATION that WE BELIEVE are simply untrue (2:23) 14. I felt threatened and scared of speaking out about the situation because of the risk it could pose to not just MY OWN SAFETY but the SAFETY OF THOSE AROUND ME as well(2:35) 15. When Selen had posted the tweet about her cover being private, SEVERAL EN MEMBERS REACHED OUT to Selen and WE expressed our concerns (2:53) 16. WE WERE genuinely concerned and WE WANTED to understand the situation as WE WERE ALL in the dark about it (3:01) 17. Once she notified ALL OF US regarding her hospitalization, WE immediately reached out to her, EACH OTHER and HER MANAGER to confirm her safety (3:08) 18. Her manager also immediately reached out to her and her emergency contact and kept US updated throughout the entire situation as well (3:17) 19. It's been a VERY TOUGH TIME for A LOT OF US (3:30) Vox: 20. I am joining this stream to talk about MY EXPERIENCES WITH SELEN, to help you all UNDERSTAND THE CONTEXT of this a little bit better(4:01) 21. All I would like to ask, is that you can take the information that I am going to present AT FACE VALUE (4:16) 22. 23. It is very important to establish THIS PATTERN OF EVENTS HAVE HAPPENED BEFORE ON MULTIPLE OCASSIONS including her Fall Guys tournament in August 20233, a voice pack in May of the same year and an outfit contest also in May(5:08) 24. In each of these situations, Selen would be working on one of the projects I have mentioned, she would be given clear communication about confirming certain aspects with STAFF all other livers receive and comply with and EACH TIME SHE WOULD REFUSE TO COOPERATE and when STAFF WOULD REACT APPROPIETLY she would make PUBLIC STATEMENTS THAT WOULD HURT ANY COLOR'S REPUTATION (5:24) 25. And as these situations KEPT OCURRING MYSELF AND OTHER LIVERS FELT VERY UPSET AND ANXIOUS (5:44) 26. WE FELT THESE STATEMENTS HARMED ALL OF US AS A GROUP (5:52) 27. So it is THIS CONTEXT that I hope explains why MYSELF and SOME OTHER livers decided to APPROACH SELEN and ask her handling of the latest situation (5:58) 28. So SOME livers MYSELF included ASKED SELEN WHY SHE TWEETED ABOUT THE COVER IN THE WAY THAT SHE DID (6:10) 29. Expressing that WE FELT it was unnecessary and HARMFUL (6:15) 30. According to Selen's LAWYER it's THIS EVENT that THEY CLAIMED to be a build up of and what THEY claimed to be a BUILD UP OF PAST EXPERIENCES (6:20) 31. That let to ACCUSSATIONS MADE BY SELEN THAT SHE WAS BULLIED and HARASSED (6:27) 32. Throughout MY FRIENDSHIP WITH SELEN, I did my best to SUPPORT HER IN PRIVATE and talk to her about any problem she might been having WHENEVER I HAD THE CHANCE (6:37) 33. Having THOROUGHLY REVIEWED THE DOCUMENTS SENT TO ANYCOLOR BY HER LAWYER (6:47) 34. And BASED ON WHAT I KNOW PERSONALLY AND HAVE BEEN TOLD BY SELEN AS HER FRIEND MYSELF and OTHER MEMBERS vehemently BELIEVE these claims to be COMPLETELY UNTRUE (6:50) 35. I feel VERY CONFIDENT in saying that the way I and OTHER LIVERS COMMUNICATED WITH SELEN ABOUT THIS INCIDENT WAS FAIR AND REASONABLE (7:00) 36. ESPECIALLY CONSIDERING OUR BUILTUP ANXIETY OVER THIS REPEATING PATTERN OF BEHAVIOUR (7:09) 37. IN MY OPINION I DO NOT THINK THAT IT WAS A FORM OF HARASSEMENT (7:15) 38. 39. Based on this document, Selen had wanted to use this as PROOF OF STAFF SHOWING FAVORITISM FOR SOME MEMBERS OVER OTHERS as at the time I wasn't reprimanded by staff having made that tweet (7:42) 40. I followed this issue up with my MANAGERS and I was told that THEY didn't reach out because THEY didn't want to cause further controversy at the time (7:54) 41. However, I have been asked to delete OTHER TWEETS on MULTIPLE OCCASSION when I have ACCIDENTALLY BROKEN A RULE (8:02) 42. These recording were HELD without my knowledge FOR ALMOST AN ENTIRE YEAR (8:24) 43. Selen had told me PRIVATELY about HER DISAGREETMENTS WITH STAFF AND HER MANAGERS (8:46) 44. And I have done my best to support her and TO HELP HER MAKE WHAT I THOUGHT WERE THE RIGHT CHOICES EVEN WHEN SHE TALKED ABOUT WANTING TO GRADUATE (8:51) 45. Leaving Nijisanji is always an option FOR LIVERS, if she had wanted to graduate beforehand SHE WAS GIVEN VERY MANY CHANCES TO DO SO AMICABLY (9:00) 46. And on MULTIPLE OCCASSIONS Selen had told US she planned on graduating but then would go back shortly after (9:09) 47. For example she told ME she would be GRADUATING ON THE DAY WE HOSTED THE PRISM CUP but as you know this didn't happen (9:17) 48. She also after being WARNED BY STAFF DUE TO HER REPEATED RULE BREAKAGES IN MAY of last year TOLD OTHER LIVERS THAT SHE WAS BEING TERMINATED AT THAT TIME, when like I said she had JUST BEEN WARNED NOTHING ELSE (9:25) 49. Because I trusted her so much and I listened to her NARRATIVE OF HALF OR UNTRUTHS ABOUT HER RELATIONSHIP WITH ANYCOLOR... (9:38) 50. And NOW I know that my intense feelings at the time came from OMITTED CONTEXT AND FALSEHOODS (9:57) 51. So regardless of how I NOW feel about Selen having been my friend and having HURT ME AND MY FELLOW LIVERS IN THIS WAY (10:18) 52. 53. When I and OTHER LIVERS found out what had happened and WE PRAYED FOR HER safety and WE STILL DO (10:30) Mike: 54. (pointless sounds) 55. The document contains SOME information that WE believe is INCORRECT, that COULD BE HARMFUL for US and it is just PRIVATE INFORMATION that is VERY TERRIFYING to have been you know shown before you like that (12:33) 56. WE have been working VERY VERY HARD to try to understand what it is what we can and cannot say about this but we wanted to make sure that what we shared was as much as WE WERE ABLE TO SHARE (13:28) 57. WITHIN Nijisanji EN everyone always makes an effort to make sure that everyone who wants to be INCLUDED IN SOMETHING has the opportunity to do so, whether that be online or OFFLINE (13:43) (3) CONCLUSIONS: a. The black stream was scripted by lawyers, who used these three livers as cover for ANYCOLOR’S responsibility for its statements on this matter. b. With the possible exception of Mike, Elira and Vox were not chosen at random to be part of this stream. c. Elira was used to attack Selen’s claims and moral character, from the angle that Selen included personal information in a document that could have become public; information ANYCOLOR characterizes as slanderous and that poses a thread to the personal safety of some livers. Elira was chosen to deliver this part, because just with like Selen and Millie, she was one of the few whose personal safety was threatened by that document. d. Vox was used to attack Selen’s claims that staff had a bias against her and that there were bullies among the livers. Vox was chosen for this role, because he not only considers himself Selen’s friend and confident (with alleged access to private comments from her), but also a recording of him was used by Selen in the document as evidence of staff bias. e. From this stream, it can be inferred that there was indeed bullying against Selen, that there was bias from staff against Selen and that there is a good chance that the bullying from some livers was encouraged by staff. f. Elira, Enna, Millie and Vox are confirmed among Selen’s bullies, being the first three possibly the worst among the other harassers. g. There is a faint hint that Elira might hold some authority, since it is mentioned by her that there was some sort of expectation "from the audience" for her to address the Selen issue. h. The reason for ANYCOLOR to threat Selen the way it did (to try to get rid of her) was because of tweets, which they thought hurt their honor. But to this day, they all keep praying for Selen’s safety... Which seems to have worked wonders, because she is doing fucking AWESOME!