❤World of tanks quick chat commands






❤ Click here: http://lomeabebur.fastdownloadcloud.ru/dt?s=YToyOntzOjc6InJlZmVyZXIiO3M6MjE6Imh0dHA6Ly9iaXRiaW4uaXQyX2R0LyI7czozOiJrZXkiO3M6MzQ6IldvcmxkIG9mIHRhbmtzIHF1aWNrIGNoYXQgY29tbWFuZHMiO30=




































Hetzer tank Destroyer Tank isn't good enough to shoot from long distance, but it's have a good camouflage. A draw means that neither team has won or lose, except for Assault mode, where the defending team wins when battle time expires. They stay safe by remaining well within friendly lines and provide support against tough stationary or slow targets.
Examples: In that snippet we can see that the command to hide the interface is assigned to CTRL-G, the free camera to Right Shift + Right Control + Backspace, and the map command is on the M key. And if they leave, the party disbands and you're thrown back into game chat. The freecamera controls you listed work amazingly in replays.
It did work but no longer. Hetzer con Destroyer Tank isn't good enough to shoot from long distance, but it's have a good camouflage. I think it comes with a sound effect. We constantly monitor chat messages, and you can be banned from chat or from the game for violating these rules. You cannot start a la with an incomplete crew. Can be locked on in settings screen. The crux is really simple, What should a chat ban entail, In my view it should be a ban from all communication, I dont care that you found it hard to platoon while you served your u ban. 
 - Trolls and other folks will continue to disgorge vile bile when hiding behind a keyboard when in real life they mostly timid and cowardly not able even to say boo to a goose. So, make sure you have position your SPG didn't near anything that can block it's line of fire, such as big rocks or building.
Personally I cant see any reason why this should be? Its a punishment right? Then they should be banned from all communication. While they can do no harm other than spam Hold and capture the base the point of a punishment is to get the person to hopefully modify their behavior. Not everyone is playing after primary school and trust me, chat bans achieve nothing so Ive been told.... Why punish the rest of the team also when you cant, at least, communicate thorugh battle commands in some form or another? Not everyone is playing after primary school and trust me, chat bans achieve nothing so Ive been told.... Why punish the rest of the team also when you cant, at least, communicate thorugh battle commands in some form or another? Try a little consistency in your arguments. While chat bans do little ask how i know giving chat commands to banned players does very little to benefit the team and only gives an offender a mode to which they can still communicate through. If you are going to ban someone ban everything or else why bother. Chat Ban is useless, just take chat completely off and If there is whining after a game just ignore. I dont think I agree that they are useless though, Yes they do very little. BUT if WG didnt ban people from chat that would be a proxy condoning of bad behavior by WG. I guarantee you if people knew there was no punishment for chat violations the chat would be much much worse than it is. Chat Ban is useless, just take chat completely off and If there is whining after a game just ignore. Now that is a great idea... Punish them all, 50 lashes!!! If people abuse Battle commands spam then they get removed? Try a little consistency in your arguments. While chat bans do little ask how i know giving chat commands to banned players does very little to benefit the team and only gives an offender a mode to which they can still communicate through. If you are going to ban someone ban everything or else why bother. My argument is quite straight forward. Chat bans are quite straight forward, you are banned for one violation or another swearing, abuse, racism etc etc. My argument is quite straight forward. Chat bans are quite straight forward, you are banned for one violation or another swearing, abuse, racism etc etc. Was my english not clear enough? So please tell me how do you propose WG rememdy this? Can a banned person use only punctuation? Like we wont see banned people spamming lines of it, that will never happen? Or where do you draw the line because i cannot believe for a moment that you would suggest that the lack of the hold or capture the base command caused you to ever lose a game Was my english not clear enough? Just a thought and could be quite handy as in the heat of battle, who has time to type...? The Honour System is broken and given the number of players expecting WG to be able to moderate and manage the salty and afk players is pretty optimistic. Either its really resource intensive with people reviewing 10,000's of replays a day or an automated one that lacks sense and repeats the problems we have today but in new and equally frustrating ways. The current system can be misused by Platoons as well as others too. I do report folks directly when they are racist, sexist and particularly profane and the new replay system is very handy with this. This happens probably once or twice a week. What I think would be needed is a set of more severe measure that might actually change behaviours. Trolls and other folks will continue to disgorge vile bile when hiding behind a keyboard when in real life they mostly timid and cowardly not able even to say boo to a goose. I'd imagine that most players wouldn't be able to tell you WG's exact rules, regulations and consequences regarding chat abuse. And if you do, you'll know it's not totally precise anyway. This should spell out the precise consequences for them if the behaviour continues. Including whether or not loss of use of the battle command menu is part of the package. If the person does then reoffend, they have no excuse about what's going to happen to them. As the MM should just randomly allocate out these people across the red and green teams. I dont think I agree that they are useless though, Yes they do very little. BUT if WG didnt ban people from chat that would be a proxy condoning of bad behavior by WG. I guarantee you if people knew there was no punishment for chat violations the chat would be much much worse than it is. Maybe, just that those bans are lifted that is why they are useless, punishment should Be More effective Let's say you lose credits certain amount. Honour system now does not support this, there should Be a filter for Bad language like this Forum has. Maybe, just that those bans are lifted that is why they are useless, punishment should Be More effective Let's say you lose credits certain amount. Honour system now does not support this, there should Be a filter for Bad language like this Forum has. There is a filter, just not a good one, Removing credits could get complicated because you can purchase credits for real money. But then that would mean WG would have to pay people to moderate. This is the crux of the issue. It not so easy when trying to give more permanent punishment. The biggest issue that you run into one that WG wont violate is that even a offensive player is still a customer who they can bilk for money so giving a harsh punishment that could possibly drive away a player is not something they would jump at doing. I agree though it might be better at controlling player behavior than the current system. Ive never seen a game that handed out harsh punishments easily that survived very long. A balance has to be struck. No it was clear, just inaccurate. I can tell you that yes, sometimes you press SOS and no one responds. But sometimes they do. I can tell you that yes, sometimes this has swung a game, on several occasions myself and the person who came to help have gone and killed the remainder of the enemy together. I can tell you in Plats it would be helpful for the above reasons when serving a chat ban. I can tell you that yes, focusing fire can turn a game. Just a thought and could be quite handy as in the heat of battle, who has time to type...? So you want WG to add more commands so chat banned players can communicate more? I have never read the matchmaking thread so any reference to what goes on there is lost on me. But i know for a fact people will go the way they want to go despite how many times you spam directions at them. Its not just new players that do this either, not by a long shot. But this is all neither here not there. The crux is really simple, What should a chat ban entail, In my view it should be a ban from all communication, I dont care that you found it hard to platoon while you served your chat ban. Thats the consequences of it. The fact that there are consequences to it just might make some people rethink their behavior. As Petes85 was saying the penalty should be harsher. Giving someone the ability to still communicate effectively doesnt feel like much of a punishment. This is akin to parents to send their kids to their room,,,, with their xbox and Ipad. While the efficacy of the bans is low it is better than it would be if those players could still communicate. No one would give a chat ban a second thought if they could still effectively communicate. I have a feeling that the chat ban you served might have had somewhat of an effect. It got you to come here and try to advocate for lessening of the punishments. I have a counter idea that would be super simple to implement. Dont get chat banned then you dont have to worry about having combat commands. Its super simple to avoid chat bans. EDIT I would like to see Go left, right and center commands added to the game. That way they could be translated into the users language some maybe a few more people would understand what you mean by them. Edited by onlypainhurts, 19 July 2018 - 02:55 PM. So you want WG to add more commands so chat banned players can communicate more? I have never read the matchmaking thread so any reference to what goes on there is lost on me. But i know for a fact people will go the way they want to go despite how many times you spam directions at them. Its not just new players that do this either, not by a long shot. But this is all neither here not there. The crux is really simple, What should a chat ban entail, In my view it should be a ban from all communication, I dont care that you found it hard to platoon while you served your chat ban. Thats the consequences of it. The fact that there are consequences to it just might make some people rethink their behavior. As Petes85 was saying the penalty should be harsher. Giving someone the ability to still communicate effectively doesnt feel like much of a punishment. This is akin to parents to send their kids to their room,,,, with their xbox and Ipad. While the efficacy of the bans is low it is better than it would be if those players could still communicate. No one would give a chat ban a second thought if they could still effectively communicate. I have a feeling that the chat ban you served might have had somewhat of an effect. It got you to come here and try to advocate for lessening of the punishments. I have a counter idea that would be super simple to implement. Dont get chat banned then you dont have to worry about having combat commands. Its super simple to avoid chat bans. EDIT I would like to see Go left, right and center commands added to the game. That way they could be translated into the users language some maybe a few more people would understand what you mean by them. Wrong again has RL not taught you anything about assumptions? I came here to post about MM if you must know, and whilst here thought Id ask about this... I actually expected a positive response, but then always the optimist hey... One involves a two way conversation, talking, discuss etc. The other is sending a signal. Super simple to avoid... Yes, there were many reasons for my idea of adding those directional commands to the command bar, being better for new players and other nationalities being just two. Glad to hear you at least agree with one of the several points that make sense...