Merge two branches in git 






=>  http://wilfsutingri.nnmcloud.ru/d?s=YToyOntzOjc6InJlZmVyZXIiO3M6MjE6Imh0dHA6Ly9iaXRiaW4uaXQyX2RsLyI7czozOiJrZXkiO3M6MjU6Ik1lcmdlIHR3byBicmFuY2hlcyBpbiBnaXQiO30=




































For example assume I used to have repA, repB, repC, and a branch branch1 in all of them. But I have many branches with the same name in different repositories on porpoise. I am new to git. It appears that there is a problem under this section.
If it truly behaved as if it was always one combined repo, I would be able to check out any of those branches and it would work. Almost all version control systems have branching options. For hints where to find more information about Git and merging see.
Merging Where branches are used to maintain separate lines of development, at some stage you will want to merge the changes made on one branch back into the other branch, or vice versa. Most of them are untracked files from different folder that used to be a repository. So, in my example above, I want to checkout branch 2. Tag The commit of chosen tag. And I wish to be able to git checkout a branch in my new repository, and get the correct changes in each directory that used to be a repository. Conflicts Although major merge work is done by git automatically, a conflict may happen during merge i.
Git Compare Two Branches - If it truly behaved as if it was always one combined repo, I would be able to check out any of those branches and it would work. We have branches representing releases and for each repo, the release branch has the same name.
A while ago my team had code for our project spread out in two different Git repositories. Over time we realized that there was no good reason for this arrangement and was just merge two branches in git general hassle and source of friction, so we decided to combine our two repositories into one repository containing both halves of the code base, with each of the old repositories in its own subdirectory. However, we wanted to preserve all of the change history from each repo and have it available in the new repository. The good news is that Git makes this sort of thing very easy to do. The bad news is that there are a few different ways to do it and some of them end up with a less desirable result at least for our purposes than others. One side effect of this is that when you import the source code using a subtree merge all of the files show up as newly added files. You can see the history of commits for those files in aggregate i. I wanted to glue to repositories together and have them look as though they had always been one repository all along. Now we have all the files from OldA and OldB in repository New, sitting in separate subdirectories, and we have both the commit history and the individual file history for all files. Hi — Thank you for this. I am new to git. I have applied the steps in this page. Why does this no longer work. Have I lost history during the merge. But the tags and remote branches stay behind. Is that to be expected. If it truly behaved as if it was always one combined repo, I would be able to check out any of those branches and it would work. Would I need to create a local branch1 and merge each branch in like I did master, for all remote branches that are non-origin. And back to tags, uh, how would that work since a typical tag is on a particular commit. I suppose I can go back and loop something like find. merge two branches in git Probably want to diff on directories too. Your process is: init add deleteme. Were you able to move to one of your old branches. Thanks Hi eitcho, Thanks for responding. I do see the branches you talk about. But I have many branches with the same name in different repositories on porpoise. And I wish to be able to git checkout a branch in my merge two branches in git repository, and get the correct changes in each directory that used to be a repository. For example assume I used to have repA, repB, repC, and a branch branch1 in all of them. Most of them are untracked files from different folder that used to be a repository. Maybe there is some flag to the merge I can use, or a different place I can try to do the merge from. Did you encountered something like that. Super thanks, the script was really helpful. This is likely a current limitation of git log. Here is how to push changes upstream. You can reorder the commits, and you can remove them weeding out bad or otherwise unwanted patches. Here are the two that I used. It appears that there is a problem under this section. Sorry Me just putting too much on one line. None of my folders had spaces, so I will admit up front, that this is un-tested. I had many headaches with this type of thing in the past. Just to verify: it seems that the latest version of the script by eitch is this one:. I have a large project with 29 repositories to merge. Please, commit your changes before you merge. There is also one commit in the old aaa repo, which the script seems to be getting past. It is closed with a single quote, but not started with a single quote. So, this segues into my next problem. We have branches representing releases and for each repo, the release branch has the same name. So, in my example above, I want to checkout branch 2. The link to the 0. The only thing I think will be difficult or impossible is preserving our tags. They are much the same as our branches, spanning all the repos. So, the state of my new combined repo, when at tag T, should mimic the state of each of the old repos when each repo is at its own tag T. The only other way would be to somehow recreate the new repo in chronological order and create the tags as I go—seems impossibly complicated.