Acteur american history x 






=>  http://worknagela.nnmcloud.ru/d?s=YToyOntzOjc6InJlZmVyZXIiO3M6MjE6Imh0dHA6Ly9iaXRiaW4uaXQyX2RsLyI7czozOiJrZXkiO3M6MjU6IkFjdGV1ciBhbWVyaWNhbiBoaXN0b3J5IHgiO30=




































Lamont apparaît comme le seul vrai ami de Derek en prison, et il est lui-même l'une des raisons qui contribuent à maintenir Derek en vie : il se sert de son influence pour empêcher les détenus noirs de s'attaquer à lui. The father more plausibly could be a visiting uncle with whom Derek was not acquainted. Danny's class was new, experimental, individualized, and certainly not a part of his original curriculum.
The reality in American jails is radically different than what is portrayed in this film. Derek: I have this feeling.
Il raconte l'histoire de Derek qui, voulant venger la mort de son père, abattu par un dealer noir, a épousé les thèses racistes d'un groupuscule de militants d'extrême droite et s'est mis au service de son leader, brutal théoricien prônant la suprématie de la race blanche. Get the bleep out of my house! L'histoire est vraiment bien recherché et profonde, et parfois malheureusement raconte une vérité. Derek tire sur deux d'entre eux, tuant le premier sur le coup. This he does although he has promised Derek he would not go, which causes Derek to go looking for him at the gathering. This extreme and violent reaction clearly indicates that the racial divide within the prison, at least according to this film, is the result of White intolerance. On this day Derek has been released from prison. The Skinhead Party No anti-Majority film would be complete without a skinhead gathering Note: had a rally in a rural field that was attended by an assortment of skinheads, neo-nazis and Klansmen. In the Autobiography of Malcolm X he explains that since he was given a white man's name he never knew his real last name.
American History X (1998) en Streaming HD VOSTFR Gratuit Complet - Une belle claque, avec des acteurs tous au top!
Shortly after, I viewed the film American History X, with no intention of writing yet another detailed description and analysis, but I could not resist. I was prompted to write by the similarities that I noticed between the two films. In contrast, Whites are portrayed as brutally insensitive, oppressive, intolerant, hateful, violent, greedy, narrow-minded and destructive. These films show how the mean spiritedness of White Gentiles deeply hurts angelic minorities, who are at a loss to understand such raw hatred. Frequently, they feature a benevolent minority with tremendous patience and moral conviction who seeks to exorcise the poisonous racism demonstrated by the White characters the very preachy Guess Who's Coming to Dinner starring Sydney Poitier is a shining example. The hypocrisy of reinforcing such crude racial stereotypes, when the prime message of these preachy films is that stereotypes should be eliminated, is seemingly lost on those who make them. A key element of this film genre is that the White Majority cannot be trusted. Those who make such films seek to demonstrate that although Whites on the surface might appear civilized, there is a latent racial barbarism that can be aroused through manipulation. The message is that any White person, no matter how normal, can quickly cross the line from being civil into being consumed by racial fanaticism, violence and hatred. The thieves, members of the Crip gang, are trying to break into Derek's truck. Danny awakens and notifies his brother who is in the midst of having sex with his girlfriend. Derek gets out of bed and exposes a beautifully-built physique which supports a large swastika tattoo on left side of his chest. He pulls out a gun and goes outside on a shooting rampage against the thieves. It is difficult not to be reminded of a dramatic shooting scene early in the film Dirty Harry, where Clint Eastwood exits a diner to bust up a robbery in progress. Interestingly, the victims are also Black. We are then shifted to a meeting between Murray Elliott Gouldone of Danny's teachers who is Jewish, and Bob Sweeney Avery Brooksthe school's Black Principal. He learned this nonsense somewhere Murray and he can unlearn it too. I will not give up on this child yet. At the conclusion of the meeting Danny is called into the Principal's office. Then we discover that his brother Derek has been put in jail for the shootings we witnessed in the opening scenes. Sweeney appoints himself Danny's history teacher moral vanguard. Danny is assigned an essay which is due the next day, and the subject is his brother Derek. He must finish this essay by the next morning or be expelled from school. Note: In the film, the Catherine Chapman character submitted an essay titled Christmas is Dead, which was also considered too politically incorrect. Chapman received a failing grade and turned down an offer for a re-write. Derek's release from prison is cause for concern by local police. For this reason Principal Sweeney is summoned to the police station. He and he and a number of officers acteur american history x shown watching a tv interview that Derek gave after his father, a firefighter, had been murdered. This animosity would have been deemed justifiable given the circumstances. So instead of feeling sorrow for Derek's loss, we are made to feel angry towards him. He clearly does not like what he is observing. His environment, which was predominantly White, has become multiracial. This means there are now turf wars i. His negative reaction is not unlike that of many other members of the White Majority who have had similar transitions in their neighbourhoods. On this day Derek has been released from prison. Principal Sweeney calls Derek and expresses his concern about the Hitler essay Danny wrote. Derek shares the Principal's concern and then lectures Danny about what he has written, thus indicating that he Derek has changed his views The change in Derek is ironic since it is more likely that a prison experience will make White people more, not less, racist. Shortly after this, Danny is at his computer and starts writing the essay assigned by Principal Sweeney. He has been asked to analyze the events surrounding Derek's incarceration and it is through the medium of Danny's essay that we see the rest of the story portrayed in the film. Shock Scenes: The Grocery Store, Dinner, and the Shooting Revisited The first stop in Danny's retrospective endeavour is a brutal scene designed to shock the audience. Derek gives a firebrand speech to these youth, who it turns out are skinheads. acteur american history x He recites the names of those within the group who used to work there. This isn't our bleeping neighbourhood. We're on a battlefield tonight. Are we going to stand on the sidelines, quietly standing there while our country gets raped. Are we going to ante up and do something about it. You're goddamn right we are. acteur american history x Derek's rhetoric is strong, but it expresses a sense of dispossession felt by many members of the White Majority. Open borders which will render the White Majority a minority, and White people losing their jobs to illegals who both replace workers and undercut wages, are legitimate concerns. However, it's not long before these concerns are tarnished. The skinheads are then shown putting nylons and ski masks over their faces. They fiercely charge the grocery store like a wild pack of animals and proceed to terrorize and beat the employees who all appear to be Hispanic. One of the cashiers has the contents of various jars are poured on her. At one point they flood her face with milk and taunt her. These brutal sequences are shot in black and white. What the film is trying to do is associate the types of valid concerns expressed by Derek in his speech, with pro-White fanaticism and violence. The purpose is to shame members of the White Majority into silence and make them believe that if they ever express similar concerns and raise the same types of questions, the inevitable result is out-of-control violence. This is a crude propagandistic tactic intended to discourage the expression of legitimate racial frustration Note: In the Catherine Chapman acteur american history x asked some similarly provocative questions while riding home from school on a city bus, albeit they were much lighter in both substance and tone than Derek's in his intense and often crude speech. It's also significant that it is skinheads ambushing a Korean-owned grocery store, when the the real life tension in the U. Danny's next recollection is of another shocking scene. This time it's dinner at the house, with his teacher Murray the same one who was seen discussing Danny's pro-Hitler essay with Principal Sweeney early in the film as his mother's guest the episodes of this film are not shown in linear sequence so the dinner is taking place before Danny wrote the essay and before Derek was sent to jail. The conversation turns to the L. The exchanges get heated in a hurry. It's not long before the conversation leads to Derek's loss of composure. It's never going to happen Murray. I will bleeping cut your Shylock nose off and stick it up your ass before I let that happen. Coming in here and poisoning my family's dinner with your Jewish, nigger-loving, hippie bullshit. Get the bleep out of my house. See this he exposes the Swastika on his chest. The hysterical and violent skinhead is therefore startlingly contrasted with the rational and hurt Jew. This scene is also in black and white Is this a hint that the issues are being over-simplified for dramatic effect. Derek, we now learn, wound up killing two of the thieves. One of them was ordered by Derek to open his mouth and place it along the sidewalk, and as he did this we could hear his teeth scraping against the cement. In slow motion and in black and white obviously for dramatic effectDerek then rams his foot on the back of the guy's head, thrusting his mouth into the sidewalk and busting open his face. This act was so brutal that even Danny, a hard core skinhead at the time, was horrified. It is also worthy of notice that the audience is being manipulated to feel sorry for the Crips who were committing a crime, and who in real life are notorious for killing Whites. Some of these murders are the result of initiation assignments which require aspiring members to hunt down a White person s and kill them. The Skinhead Party No anti-Majority film would be complete without a skinhead gathering Note: had a rally in a rural field that was attended by an assortment of skinheads, neo-nazis and Klansmen. Towards such a get-together Danny heads to before finishing his essay. This he does although he has promised Derek he would not go, which causes Derek to go looking for him at the gathering. Derek is no longer a part of the movement but those in attendance are not aware of this. To them Derek is an icon because of what he did to the Black thieves at his house. They give him a hero's welcome. Cameron vows to kill Derek and Derek beats him unconscious. As Derek is leaving the scene, the skinheads, realizing what he has done, turn on him. He is forced to flee. Later on Danny catches up with Derek. Derek describes how he allied himself with the neo-nazi prisoners but that this association soured. He became disillusioned because the apparent division along racial lines was more of a facade than reality. He observed that inter-racial commerce was taking place between the racial factions. This included a fellow neo-nazi purchasing drugs from Hispanic prisoners only to sell them at profit to White prisoners. This is acteur american history x because a prison experience usually either reinforces or arouses racial awareness. Another key event was Derek's bonding with a Black inmate named Lamont, with whom he is paired for the purpose of folding laundry. Lamont is friendly, and possesses a sharp sense of humor. He is also kind enough to give Derek some friendly advice about how to conduct himself in prison. It fell because the officer grabbed the tv from Lamont's hand thus releasing it from his grip. Derek got a mere three year sentence - half of what the Black inmate got - for actually killing two people. The obvious implication is that the justice system - both law enforcement and the courts - favours Whites and unfairly punishes Blacks by giving them stiffer sentences for lesser crimes - of which they might not even be guilty. Derek is jolted into realizing just how unfair White society is towards Blacks. Derek is transformed from the hard core racist who would not even speak to Lamont when they started folding laundry together. He even begins to to play basketball with the Black inmates. By allowing Derek to play with them the Black prisoners demonstrate their racial tolerance. The neo-nazi prisoners, on the other hand, are very upset that Derek has crossed the racial boundary. Later on they corner him in the shower, smash his face against the wall, and then he is sodomized. This extreme and violent reaction clearly indicates that the racial divide within the prison, at least according to this film, is the result of White intolerance. After the beating, Derek awakens in the prison's medical ward. At his bedside is his former teacher Bob Sweeney, the Black Principal we saw near the beginning of the film. Derek's racial rehabilitation started with the Black prisoner Lamont, followed by the tolerance of the Black prisoners who allowed him to play basketball with them, and is now being continued by Principal Preacher. Sweeney is concerned that Danny is taking the same route as Derek and intends to reach out to Derek as well. Sounding very much like a Priest, he asks Derek: Has anything you've done made your life better. Has your prejudicial behaviour done you any good. You gotta help me now. Get me out of here. Lamont chastises Derek for breaking ties with the neo-nazi prisoners and cautions Derek that he will now probably be targeted by other acteur american history x What is the likelihood that a Black prisoner would scold a White inmate for breaking away from a group of neo-nazis. Derek acknowledges that the Black inmates will probably get him. Miraculously, he escapes the rest of his sentence without being attacked. A sense of injustice will be felt here by the viewers of the film, because the more hardened White criminal is getting out while the kinder and gentler Black inmate must stay behind. Derek: I have this feeling. I'm thinking the reason I'm getting out of here in one piece is you. Lamont: Man, you don't owe me shit. Derek bonds acteur american history x the Black inmate, who was clearly the voice of reason, and then with the determined Black Principal Preacher. These Black men are depicted as highly compassionate and it is Derek's interaction with them which leads to the racial deprogramming which re-connects him with his humanity; a humanity which was stolen from him by a couple of bigoted White men: his racist father see dinner dialogue belowand by Cameron Alexander, the manipulative neo-nazi leader. Portraying the racial rehabilitation of a young White man in a tough multiracial prison is of course an extreme distortion of reality. The reality in American jails is radically different than what is portrayed in this film. The following is a passage from Charles Silberman's book Criminal Violence, Criminal Justice, which was taken from David Duke's book p. In a number of large cities, jail officials automatically place young whites in protective custody for their own safety. Sometimes the move comes too late: young offenders often raped in the van transporting them to jail. I feel lucky Dan, because it was wrong what I did. It was eating me up. It was going to kill me. I kept asking myself: 'How did I buy into this shit. The tone of the above passage sounds more like that of acteur american history x born again Christian reflecting on his past sinful life before re-discovering Jesus Christ, than it does someone who just got out of prison. Such frustration is portrayed as purely irrational hatred unleashed through the misguidance of people with closed minds his father - see below and manipulation of those with self-serving agendas the neo-nazi leader Cameron. Danny, therefore, has joined Derek by also re-acquiring his status of a human being. Dinner With Dad Because the sequences of this film are not linear in time, the scene with Derek's father at the dinner table, at this point, as described in Danny's essay, is the earliest event in the whole story. Derek and Danny are now shown to have been normal boys, the complete opposite of the skinheads they become later on. The dialogue starts with Derek gushing about Bob Sweeney, the Black Principal who at the time was only a teacher. He enthusiastically informs his father that the Mr. Sweeney will be giving an exam on a book with a Black theme and that the class is studying Black literature. You know we're talking about a book here, but I'm also talking about my job. They only got the job because they're Black, not because they were the best. Is that what America is all about. No, America is about best man for the job. You do your best, you get the job. You know, this affirmative action crap, I don't know what that's about, it's like some hidden agenda or something going on. You see what I'm saying. I didn't think about it like that. I get what you're saying. He seems to be stunned by what he has heard. The father more plausibly could be a visiting uncle with whom Derek was not acquainted. And the look of shock on Danny's face also indicates that the father was saying something that he was not accustomed to hearing. Both Derek and Danny were transformed from being not the least bit racist to being fanatically racist within an extremely short period. What are the odds that the father had successfully hidden his racist views from his children for so long only to have them suddenly come pouring out at a time when one of his sons was well into his high school years. How could such a brief exchange successfully counter the years of multicultural and anti-racist read: anti-White conditioning to which Derek had been subjected in school and elsewhere. American History X, not surprisingly, portrays the very opposite. There is seemingly no middle ground. This is of course ludicrous, being simply a crude propagandistic attempt to both intimidate and shame the White Majority into silence. One curious development in American History X occurs towards the end when Danny is shot in the washroom of his high school by a Black student with whom he had had a run-in early in the film, presumably in the same washroom. Life's too short to be pissed off all the time. It's just not worth it. We must not be enemies, though passion may have strength, it must not break our bonds of affection. The mystic cores of memory will swell and again and touch as surely they will be by the better angels of our nature. A friend cited as evidence Derek's speech to the skinheads before they ambushed the Korean grocery store, some of the father's insightful refutations of affirmative action during dinner, and the portrayal of racial tension in Danny's neighbourhood. Also cited acteur american history x the murders of Derek's father by a couple of Black crack addicts, and his brother Danny by a Black student. It's too acteur american history x to cite the inclusion of these scenes as acteur american history x sort of breakthrough in notoriously minoritycentric Hollywood. The fact that it showed some things that aren't usually seen in these types of films should not generate too much excitement, nor hope. I believe the film, as did is letting us know that they the Progressive-minority coalition realize that multiracialism is not all it's cracked up to be, but that the White Gentile Majority, despite its sometimes justifiable frustration, should never consider doing anything about it. They appear to be telling us that there is no reasonable or civilized means of White protest, so don't even try. The film is creating the impression that we're ostensibly trapped in a situation which is probably not fair towards the White Majority racial double standards, job quotas, an Afrocentric school curriculum, a neighbourhood dominated by racial turf wars, the murdering of family members by Blacksbut that we have no choice but to accept it. In other words, get used to it or suffer even worse consequences. Were the murders of Derek's father and brother by Blacks an example of these inevitable consequences, or were they designed to arouse White protest. To me the answer is painfully obvious. Submit you pieces to be included on the Controversial Columnists Page!.