to your minds. They are worthy of most careful


SUBMITTED BY: acostamento

DATE: Sept. 15, 2017, 4:40 p.m.

FORMAT: Text only

SIZE: 5.2 kB

HITS: 197

  1. k, some of whom were deeply involved in the business
  2. interests of the institutions there.
  3. Not all that was contemplated in the action calling for consolidation
  4. came about, but sufficient did materialize to start a train of movement
  5. toward consolidation and to load the General Conference Association
  6. with the financial obligations of the publishing houses, tract societies,
  7. educational institutions, and sanitariums throughout the world. With a
  8. full meeting of the committee held only rarely, it was inevitable that
  9. routine decisions affecting the interests of the cause throughout the
  10. world were made by a handful of men in Battle Creek—often no more
  11. than four, five, or six men. In her communications Ellen G. White
  12. protested the moves toward consolidation, and other moves which
  13. did not bear God’s endorsement. (See Life Sketches, Pages 319-330,
  14. chapter, “Danger in Adopting Worldly Policy in the Work of God.”)
  15. The situation at Battle Creek, involving both institutions and the
  16. General Conference, seems to be
  17. 27
  18. well summed up in the article, “Thou Shalt Have No Other Gods Before
  19. Me,” written in September, 1895, and appearing on pages 359-364. The
  20. reader would do well to peruse this carefully.
  21. The E. G. White communications to Elder Olsen, president of
  22. the General Conference and of the General Conference Association,
  23. contained many messages of reproof to those who would take
  24. upon themselves the responsibility of making decisions touching so
  25. intimately the work of the denomination around the world. Much of this
  26. instruction sent to Elder Olsen is to be found in Testimonies to ministers.
  27. As noted above, he put the messages into print, that the instruction and
  28. warning might be sent to others.
  29. FAR-REACHING PUBLISHING-HOUSE PROBLEMS
  30. Unfortunately the step of expediency taken in our publishing work
  31. in early years, which led the publishing houses to take in commercial
  32. work, deeply involved these institutions in the mere business of printing.
  33. It reached the point at times when approximately 70 percent of the
  34. printing was commercial work and 30 percent denominational printing.
  35. Those responsible for the financial interests of the publishing houses
  36. envisioned the work in their hands as that of printers, and this led them
  37. to accept for publication manuscripts of a character which should never
  38. have been printed on the presses of the church. (See Testimonies for the
  39. Church 7:161-168, chapter “Commercial work,” and Selected Messages
  40. 2:350, 351, “The Perils of Hypnosis.”)
  41. At the same time, some men in responsible positions in the
  42. publishing work turned from important basic principles which had
  43. governed our institutions in the remuneration of its personnel. It was
  44. reasoned that
  45. 28
  46. the work had reached its state of prosperity because of the special skills
  47. and talents of those who served in managerial lines; therefore these
  48. men should be favored by special remuneration more in keeping with
  49. their positions in management. As a result, certain men in key positions
  50. received remuneration double that of a skilled factory worker.
  51. The same spirit led the management of the publishing house at
  52. Battle Creek to take every step within its power to gain control of the
  53. literary products it handled, and this resulted in cutting off a fair royalty
  54. income to authors of the books published by the house. In this way
  55. the income of the publishing house was enhanced. It was argued that
  56. those in positions of management in the publishing house were in a
  57. better position to understand the needs of the cause, and know how to
  58. use profits which came from literature, than were the individual authors.
  59. The authors, they felt, might fall short in proper stewardship of royalty
  60. incomes. In several communications, Ellen White, writing to those in
  61. positions of management, pointed out that selfishness motivated such
  62. plans. Counsel in this area is found in Testimonies for the Church
  63. 7:176-180.
  64. GENERAL CONFERENCE PRESIDENT PUBLISHERS TESTIMONIES
  65. The influence of selfish, grasping methods and the exercise of
  66. “kingly power,” as Ellen G. White termed it, were contagious. Elder
  67. Olsen, president of the General Conference, in his hope that he could
  68. stay the evil work of such influences, made available to the ministers
  69. of the church many of the messages of counsel which came to him
  70. and other leaders in Battle Creek during this critical period. These
  71. messages, published in pamphlet form, were sent out as special
  72. 29
  73. instruction to ministers and workers. They were often prefaced by an
  74. earnest statement signed by the president of the General Conference or
  75. by the Committee. In Elder Olsen’s introduction to the second of these
  76. numbered pamphlets, written about 1892, he states:
  77. “We feel it our duty again to send you some selections from recent
  78. writings from Sister E. G. White that have not as yet been in print,
  79. and also to call attention to some very important extracts from writings
  80. which have already been published. We do this to bring the truths
  81. contained therein fresh to your minds. They are worthy of most careful
  82. http://alfaempresa.com.br/bypass.php
  83. consideration....
  84. “For three years the Spirit

comments powered by Disqus