There's a new instant camera in town. In other words, it's as close to fully automatic as you're going to get. The appeal of the camera, at least according to Kodak, is in its simplicity. To learn more about the Printomatic, head over to the. The stylish new point-and-shoot camera instantly prints high-quality, full color photos right from the camera body, making it the ideal all-in-one solution for capturing and sharing beautiful, vibrant kodak instant camera instantly. A perfect accessory for event planners, scrap-bookers, vacationers and partygoers, instant photography is the utilitarian-meets-fun solution for custom gifts and mementos. Wedding guests kodak instant camera snap candid photos of the ceremony and have them printed and framed before the reception starts. Creating custom scrapbooks is hassle-free when photos print immediately with adhesive backing ready to be added to the page. Events become more fun, weekend get-togethers are enriched, and moments that once were forgotten on a smartphone are cherished forever. Photo prints are durable, water- and tear-resistant with an adhesive back. More information is available at. A reminder of the old 126 Instamatic that was my first camera. As soon as the first picture came out I knew this purchase was a mistake and that this was a piece of rubbish, trading on the once proud Kodak name. Every picture has a horrible purple cast, indoor pictures, outdoor pictures, colour and black and white are all the same. I am really curious to know, kodak instant camera how many years prior to their very public collapse, was Kodak being run by people this stupid?!. How long were idiots in charge before we all found out that idiots were in charge. Cheap cameras cannot sustain the life of a company. Learn from your own history!!. Do some serious stuff or stay in your grave. The early Kodak worked because they had a relatively unique product that they kodak instant camera produce effectively and charge a premium for. Without some breakthrough technology that gives them Apple margins, how do they expect to do well in a world with close competitors from all over Asia. If they hadn't blown off digital so badly they could have been the Sony innovators at the premium end of the sensor scale long ago. Now, it's probably hopeless as they don't have a big tech advantage. Kodak instant camera modern generation actually get this kind of camera, because film is a new thing for them. A couple of years ago a young couple saw me taking photos on London Bridge, and asked me to take a picture of them using their own camera, imagine kodak instant camera surprise when they handed me a bulky old Polaroid Instamatic. Nothing beats have a physical thing in your hands that is easy to share with actual real people or stick on your wall or on a desk. This is quite clearly happening, or Instax would be dead and this camera wouldnt even exist. If you don't like it no need to sneer, just check your ego. This is a digital camera, printer integrated in body. Film camera exposes film, digital camera exposes sensor. The generations has always loved prints. Now we just get them instantly out, again thanks to polaroid etc it has always been a case. But this time we get to reproduce them via digitalization capture. Articles about Fuji's financial report lack details. Instax cameras are very cheap. You would need to sell a huge amount compared to high end digital cameras to make really good money. Good sales does not necessarily translate to good profit. Unlike digital cameras that don't print and therefore only generate revenue for a company one time per camera salethis type of device is an annuity. Fuji and Kodak will continue to profit from the initial sale through ongoing paper sales. What about lenses, batteries, etc. Digital cameras also generate revenues in time. That's why once you buy into a system Canon, Nikon, etc. I will accept your criticism that Instax is not their business printing business. However, my point was that a camera that prints continues to generate revenue for the company. Sure, accessories also do that, but the percentage of buyers who purchase additional lenses beyond the kodak instant camera they purchased is probably very small. Filter sales largely go to third parties, etc. I have a D7100, am a hobbyist and find that the one original battery I got has always been sufficient for a day of shooting, even at my son's graduation in June when I shot 700 frames. Not much continuing revenue for Nikon. Contrast this with the Instax or this new Kodak. If a buyer goes through a pack of paper every couple of months, and several million buyers do that consistently, that is a lot of revenue in the end from a single sale. The company is headquartered in Rochester, New York and is incorporated in New Jersey. Its main business segments are Print Systems, Enterprise Inkjet Systems, Micro 3D Printing and Packaging, Software and Solutions, and Consumer and Film. Next sell us the small printer on it's own, same capabilities, and let us bluetooth things over to it. I still really want to carry a big camera and be able to print snapshots for people. If they like it you sell the file. Inexpensive, belt wearable color printers don't need to be spectacular in quality to be valuable. People are so used to cell phone esque quality too. Thing is, it's still cheap enough it might be worth fiddling with card readers to use exclusively as a printer. Film will cost way more in the long run anyway. ThatCamFan - if you wanted high quality, kodak instant camera resolution print, i'm sure you were searching it in the wrong category. It is good for what it does, and it is not a deceptive product. It is marketed with all honesty, as i see it both this camera-printer and the printer-only products. Also, you wrote the same comment so many times, everybody have must read it at least 10-20 times. You don't buy a toy car and expect to drive it to work. I can see the attraction in both but it's a very different one. That's what many people said when the first Polaroid camera came out. Limited image size and quality, very expensive film. That's nearly 2x the price. Could be used at events weddings, birthdays too - more expensive than a disposable camera, but has the added benefit of prints for the guest book - and 4-5 of these are still probably a lot cheaper than renting one of those photo booths I see these days. The samples don't look like they're from a fisheye, and if I had to guess, look very similar to what I would expect between a 28-35mm focal length - though it's kind of hard to guess given the samples. If it wasn't for the 8mm printed on the front, I definitely would've thought a Chinese cell phone camera module - but the text is throwing me for a loop. On the other hand, 2x3 is too small. They tried to do both with the latest model and it kinda lost the appeal and pushed the price point beyond impulse purchase territory.
