Git interactive merge
=> http://ecliricni.nnmcloud.ru/d?s=YToyOntzOjc6InJlZmVyZXIiO3M6MjE6Imh0dHA6Ly9iaXRiaW4uaXQyX2RsLyI7czozOiJrZXkiO3M6MjE6IkdpdCBpbnRlcmFjdGl2ZSBtZXJnZSI7fQ==
Usage git reflog This displays the reflog for the local repository. For reference or more reading, check out this section of the Git book: Until next time, stay sassy Internet. The commits marked 'f' will have their messages discarded in-favor of the previous commit's message.
Rewriting history means abandoning existing commits and creating new ones, that may be very similar but are different. This makes it easier to navigate your project with commands like git log, git bisect, and gitk. Step three: there is no step three Obviously you'd want to commit your changes, but who's to say you don't have some other related tweaks you want to do before making your commit.
This is an important point to remember: when you switch branches, Git resets your working directory to look like it did the last time you committed on that branch. Truly the most simplest method. The --amend flag is a convenient way to fix these minor mistakes. Here are the message text of commits: To make conflicting lines, each line that will conflict contains its own branch name master or feature1. Not to mention that interactive rebase is fantastically useful. If there are no changes staged, a --amend will still prompt you to modify the last commit message log. This avoids all of the potential pitfalls of rebasing discussed below.
Rebase as an Alternative to Merge - If you would prefer a clean, linear history free of unnecessary merge commits, you should reach for git rebase instead of git merge when integrating changes from another branch. This lets you write your code without worrying about breaking it up into isolated commits—you can fix it up after the fact.
Now you get the call that there is an issue with the website, and you need to fix it immediately. All you have to do is switch back to your master branch. This is an important point to remember: when you switch branches, Git resets your working directory to look like it did the last time you committed on that branch. It adds, removes, and modifies files automatically to make sure your working copy is what the branch looked like on your last commit to it. If you need to pull it in, you can merge your master branch into your iss53 branch by running git merge master, or you can wait to integrate those changes until you decide git interactive merge pull the iss53 branch back into master later. All you have to do is check out the branch you wish to merge into and then run the git merge command: This looks a bit different than the hotfix merge you did earlier. In this case, your development history has diverged from some older point. In this case, Git does a simple three-way merge, using the two snapshots pointed to by the branch tips and the common ancestor of the two. In order to resolve the conflict, you have to either choose one side or the other or merge the contents yourself. See 'git mergetool --tool-help' or 'git help config' for more details. If this is not correct, git interactive merge remove the file. Please enter the commit message for your changes. Lines starting with ' ' will be ignored, and an empty message aborts the commit. On branch master All conflicts fixed but you are still merging. Changes to be committed: modified: index.
