Explaining the Supreme Court's ruling denying Trump and how Alito and Thomas didn't dissent


SUBMITTED BY: wesclinthunt

DATE: Dec. 16, 2020, 1:26 p.m.

FORMAT: Text only

SIZE: 978 Bytes

HITS: 475

  1. he Supreme Court's order Friday tossing out Texas' attempt to void millions of votes in four states and help President Donald Trump capture a second term was clear and concise.
  2. Texas didn't have the right to sue Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin over their election rules and laws. Meaning the case was over and done.
  3. But Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas made a separate legal point. They issued a statement -- and importantly, not a dissent -- accompanying the order saying that the court shouldn't summarily block the types of lawsuits Texas brought. But they also said this one wasn't worthwhile. Meaning the case was over and done.
  4. The Supreme Court has long been opaque to the American public. It doesn't allow television cameras. Recording devices are banned in courtroom. Opinions and orders are issued on its website with little explanation for non-experts and experts alike.
  5. Oyez, Oyez, Oyez, here's what you need to know about Friday's action:

comments powered by Disqus