REAL BTC EXPLOIT! LEARN SOMETHIN


SUBMITTED BY: Guest

DATE: May 28, 2015, 2:35 a.m.

FORMAT: Text only

SIZE: 1.9 kB

HITS: 824

  1. why r all you so obsessed with BTC multipliers? try a fuking exploit chain. NO SHIT!!!!
  2. use your mind people, just use a exploit when you can find them. don't cry if you don't receive back
  3. exploits wallets require minimum amounts at time. Sometimes you send .1 BTC get nothing back, then you try
  4. .3 BTC and get one times, two times, three times, etc back. Some even run out and have nothing to send
  5. back, just post and say it ran out and find a new one.
  6. tested newest exploit address:
  7. Please be clear: If you send less then what I stated you fall risk of losing your coin. It may work with less,
  8. but I can only speak for the amounts I was advised to send. You have been warned!!!!
  9. I am only speaking for my own testing, no one else.
  10. -JDA SHARE-
  11. tested: 26/5/2015
  12. Try it or don't try it, but at least understand !
  13. 1LzKRiY5AT54XwoibXHKz88KXW6Q1uWgPe
  14. ( .67 BTC seems to return 1.34 BTC = 2 x times) took 1 hour
  15. 1FXiKxq8wbueE2qXcNzLkp3yJCpSAQ2SCZ
  16. ( .86 BTC seems to return 1.62393162 BTC = math unclear) took 15 mins. really quick!
  17. 1KKnyeoPSzQfia7jr2PjWf13hPXuxqFq15
  18. ( .4259 BTC seems to return 0.63884615 BTC = not clear what the math is there) took about 25 minutes or so
  19. 19ZF3sXRmPha7V6Zetdje9JaSUWX4BvxZ5
  20. ( 0.25641026 BTC seems to return 0.51282051 BTC = appears double) took about 40mins
  21. 1XgMxUqvjhiU8rmnk4J8eKNDCRWiXZ8PN
  22. ( 2 BTC seems to return 3.8034188 BTC = math not clear) took 4 of the longest hours of my life.
  23. Be clear that you can wait up to 4 hours!!! for return. So if 2 BTC is a lot to you, like it is to me!
  24. The wait will seem extremely long. I sweated bullets and holding my heart the entire wait
  25. 1KeaLF31ChbH1dMigNvnLGVTEuyysobUBC
  26. ( 0.34188034 BTC seems to return 1.02564103 BTC = 2 x times) took about 5 mins. fast! seems instant in a way

comments powered by Disqus