So yes yet again Sparrow is being pursued by undead pirates. Bruckheimer brought in to rewrite the script in March 2002, due to his knowledge of , and later that month Elliott and Rossio were brought in. Director Gore Verbinski, who used to play in a punk rock band and is best known for creating the Budweiser frogs, does an outstanding job keeping track of the myriad details required of a director, given his limited experience. Guests under 18 years of age must have parent or guardian permission to call. The village on the Isla Tesoro beyond is overrun with pirates in search of the Town Treasure. Carefree, tipsy pirates succeed in ravaging the town and setting it aflame, filling the night air with an orange glow. A young Will Turner floats up on a raft, unconscious, wearing a gold medallion round his neck.
Jack's only hope of survival lies in the legendary Trident of Poseidon, but to find it he must forge an uneasy alliance with Carina Smyth Kaya Scodelarioa brilliant and beautiful astronomer, and Henry Brenton Thwaitesa headstrong young sailor in the Royal Navy. At the helm of the Dying Gull, his pitifully small and shabby ship, Captain Jack seeks not only to reverse his recent spate of ill fortune, but pirates of the caribbean save his very life from the most formidable and malicious foe he has ever faced. I have no idea nor do I particularly care. Which I might add is pretty much how I felt about this movie and this franchise. We're five movies in now and this whole thing is just becoming monotonous and very familiar. The problem is I can't not watch it because I'm somewhat invested in the series; its like I have to watch to simply find out how this shitshow will end. Essentially its the same scenario as the Star Wars prequels, you knew they were poor, but you had to watch them all to see how it all tied up. So what the hell is going on in Pirateworld this time. Well its basically a soft reboot of the very first movie. So yes yet again Sparrow is being pursued by undead pirates. The trident can break all curses upon the sea. Conveniently, at the same time Henry bumps into the young and beautiful Carina a Horologist and astronomer who can help him find the trident and lead into a very convenient romance. He then conveniently double crosses Sparrow to take the Pearl and conveniently discovers Carina is his long lost daughter, because of course she is. In the end they all conveniently team up together to defeat Salazar in a highly predictable manner. The infamous Jack Sparrow is pretty fleeting in this movie it must be said. Apparently director Joachim Rønning wanted to go back to the original concept where Sparrow crashes in and out of scenes as comedic relief. Well they certainly fudged that up because Depp's iconic character is pretty much useless in this movie and could of easily been cut pirates of the caribbean completely. His character has no story here, he literally pops up here and there for some slapstick. He's just tagging along for the ride, the other characters actually have goals where as Sparrow merely gets in the way. His only hook is that he lost his crew after they lost confidence in him, so he's a bit depressed basically. This is why he accidentally unleashes Salazar from the devil's triangle by giving up his compass for a drink; something that escapes me because you probably gotta recall the last movie. I understand what Rønning was trying to do but here's the thing, in the original movie Sparrow was a bright new character. This type of old fashioned visual humour was a real breath of fresh air; but now the character is a has-been, old hat, nothing left, pirates of the caribbean dry. Jack Sparrow's run is essentially over and this merely proved it. Naturally this franchise is now all about the spectacular visual effects and stunts and naturally this movie does maintain that. Strangely enough despite the fact the movie is stunning to look at, its nowhere near as good as the previous movies, it didn't feel as grand or lavish to me. There was also quite a lot of bad looking greenscreen shots too. But the real guff came in sequences and ideas that either didn't make any sense or just went nowhere. At the start of the movie a very young Henry rows out into the middle of the ocean and throws himself over-board tied to a large rock. He then proceeds to sink to the exact spot where the Flying Dutchman is sunk, or waiting. Sure the kid had a map but really. The British Navy that are briefly seen here and there don't believe in all the supernatural stories they've heard. With everything that happens at sea in your world?. pirates of the caribbean You'd think this shit would be common knowledge. Sparrow and his men attempt to rob a bank by pulling its enormous steel safe out of the building through a wall by horsepower. At one point the movie literally stops dead just so Sparrow can talk quickly to pirates of the caribbean uncle Jack. Yep the movie stops dead in its tracks to simply give Paul McCartney a pointless cameo. The guards carrying Jack just haul him over to the cell holding his uncle so they can chat. Why would they do this?. At another point Sparrow is captured by some Irish. Clearly there is backstory here but we don't find out what. Then Barbossa turns up and kills the Irish leader and that's that, on with the show. Salazar's ship is just a bare skeleton of the hull or rotting wreck, but somehow it eats other ships or something. This also causes other ships to explode for some reason. Then in the finale the ocean parts yes parts for the characters to find the trident, this is quite a quick process. In fact it takes just enough time for the main protagonists to be rescued. Then right at the end God knows where various characters from the previous movies just all turn up randomly, outta nowhere, conveniently at the exact same spot for a soppy reunion. This led me to simply ask. Its like Rønning just said, pirates of the caribbean it. The real problem for this movie I fear is the fact that you gotta remember everything that's happened previously, to some degree. Don't get me wrong, its cool that the continuity is well maintained but with the number of movies in this franchise and their convoluted plots, its more like actual work than anything to keep up. Next to that the action felt very poorly choreographed and edited this time round. Just not exciting really, just mundane and unimaginative. There are way too many characters now, its really ridiculous actually. To top that it seems like they're bringing back yet another character from a previous sequel for the next movie ugh!!. As said the movie looks glossy but its by far the worst looking of the franchise. And last but not least, the movie is simply a rehash of the original. We've seen this before and its slowly happening more and more it seems, its just not acceptable. Folks at the end of the day if you're a fan of the franchise you will probably like this; although I'm very sure you may not rate it highly. If you're not a fan of the franchise or a casual movie goer, I'd say skip it because you've seen it all before I guarantee. Its not really a good stand alone movie. This franchise has officially capsized and sunk. Espen Sandberg and Joachim Ronning tell a tale in Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales. Is it a good one. Sailing in at past the 2 hour mark, pirates drags along from scene to scene, with little in the way of excitement. Throwing in a bit of humor along the way, the plot details explain enough, but not doing much more than that. The look of Captain Salazar and his crew deliver some fresh air in the existing pirate atmosphere. As usual,tThe costumes and setting are nicely selected and done. Johnny Depp does what he does best; embraces his character with amusing body movements and expressions. Javier Bardem puts forth a solid villain, while Brenton Thwaites and Kaya Scodelario seemingly just get by with their characters. Familiar faces populate Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales, but the new faces aren't enough to blow this out of the water.
