the destruction of Jerusalem. They


SUBMITTED BY: general007

DATE: Aug. 14, 2017, 1:56 a.m.

FORMAT: Text only

SIZE: 2.1 kB

HITS: 34650

  1. thodox Christians. The Universalists denied that there is to be,
  2. any future judgment and punishment. Of course they referred the
  3. twenty-fourth chapter of Matthew altogether to the destruction of
  4. Jerusalem–to the past. Evangelical Christians then denied that it
  5. referred solely to the destruction of Jerusalem; they affirmed that it
  6. taught a personal coming of Christ, to reward his saints and to
  7. justly punish his foes. Those commentators who referred it in
  8. general to the destruction of Jerusalem in their expositions, still
  9. admitted that it had a further reference to the second advent
  10. 8
  11. and the end of the world. They uniformly applied a part of the
  12. Saviour's discourse in chapters 24 and 25 to the latter event.
  13. The Universalists now take a different position; they have mostly
  14. become restorationists, admitting that there will be some
  15. punishment, even in the future. But they contend that it will be
  16. disciplinary or reformatory. They still maintain their former
  17. position that Matthew 24 has no relation to that future
  18. punishment, but refers to the destruction of Jerusalem.
  19. The opponents of Universalism, in the churches, have also
  20. changed their base, in part. While they yet contend that there will
  21. be a future judgment and eternal punishment, they now deny that
  22. Matthew 24 proves anything in regard to that day; or event, and
  23. affirm that it was all fulfilled at the destruction of Jerusalem. They
  24. are also extensively changing their position in regard to the nature
  25. of the second advent, many of them agreeing with the
  26. Universalists, saying that the advent is figurative or spiritual and
  27. has already taken place. From present indications we think that this
  28. will very soon be the prevailing opinion in all the popular churches.
  29. Many of their ablest and most influential men now advocate this
  30. view. A little more change in the same direction will unite them
  31. fully with the Universalists in a denial of the future coming of
  32. Christ, of a personal, literal advent, and of any real tangible
  33. punishment of the wicked. They find it no more difficult to
  34. spiritualize the judgment and punishment, than the c

comments powered by Disqus