11-point italic with initial letters capitalized.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Our thanks to ACM SIGCHI for allowing us to modify templates they had developed.
REFERENCES
Bowman, M., Debray, S. K., and Peterson, L. L. 1993. Reasoning about naming systems. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 15, 5 (Nov. 1993), 795-825. DOI= HYPERLINK "http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/161468.16147" http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/161468.16147.
Ding, W. and Marchionini, G. 1997. A Study on Video Browsing Strategies. Technical Report. University of Maryland at College Park.
Fröhlich, B. and Plate, J. 2000. The cubic mouse: a new device for three-dimensional input. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (The Hague, The Netherlands, April 01 - 06, 2000). CHI '00. ACM, New York, NY, 526-531. DOI= HYPERLINK "http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/332040.332491" http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/332040.332491.
Tavel, P. 2007. Modeling and Simulation Design. AK Peters Ltd., Natick, MA.
Sannella, M. J. 1994. Constraint Satisfaction and Debugging for Interactive User Interfaces. Doctoral Thesis. UMI Order Number: UMI Order No. GAX95-09398., University of Washington.
Forman, G. 2003. An extensive empirical study of feature selection metrics for text classification. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3 (Mar. 2003), 1289-1305.
Brown, L. D., Hua, H., and Gao, C. 2003. A widget framework for augmented interaction in SCAPE. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Vancouver, Canada, November 02 - 05, 2003). UIST '03. ACM, New York, NY, 1-10. DOI= HYPERLINK "http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/964696.964697" http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/964696.964697.
Yu, Y. T. and Lau, M. F. 2006. A comparison of MC/DC, MUMCUT and several other coverage criteria for logical decisions. J. Syst. Softw. 79, 5 (May. 2006), 577-590. DOI= HYPERLINK "http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2005.05.030" http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2005.05.030.
Spector, A. Z. 1989. Achieving application requirements. In Distributed Systems, S. Mullender, Ed. ACM Press Frontier Series. ACM, New York, NY, 19-33. DOI= HYPERLINK "http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/90417.90738" http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/90417.90738.
Columns on Last Page Should Be Made As Close As Possible to Equal Length
1st Author
1st author's affiliation 1st line of address 2nd line of address Telephone number, incl. country code
1st author's email address
2nd Author
2nd author's affiliation 1st line of address 2nd line of address Telephone number, incl. country code
2nd E-mail
3rd Author
3rd author's affiliation 1st line of address 2nd line of address Telephone number, incl. country code
3rd E-mail
ABSTRACT
In this paper, we describe the formatting guidelines for ACM SIG Proceedings.
Categories and Subject Descriptors
D.3.3 [Programming Languages]: Language Contructs and Features – abstract data types, polymorphism, control structures. This is just an example, please use the correct category and subject descriptors for your submission. The ACM Computing Classification Scheme: HYPERLINK "http://www.acm.org/class/1998/" http://www.acm.org/class/1998/
General Terms
Your general terms must be any of the following 16 designated terms: Algorithms, Management, Measurement, Documentation, Performance, Design, Economics, Reliability, Experimentation, Security, Human Factors, Standardization, Languages, Theory, Legal Aspects, Verification.
Keywords
Keywords are your own designated keywords.
INTRODUCTION
The proceedings are the records of the conference. ACM hopes to give these conference by-products a single, high-quality appearance. To do this, we ask that authors follow some simple guidelines. In essence, we ask you to make your paper look exactly like this document. The easiest way to do this is simply to down-load a template from [2], and replace the content with your own material.
PAGEhe page and ending with 2.54 cm (1") from the bo
