report to the session of 1891. The proposal


SUBMITTED BY: mariaauxiliadora

DATE: Sept. 15, 2017, 4:31 p.m.

FORMAT: Text only

SIZE: 4.5 kB

HITS: 11564

  1. eeting carried away very different impressions. Many felt
  2. that it was one of the most profitable meetings that they ever attended;
  3. others that it was the most unfortunate conference ever held.”
  4. DIFFERING ATTITUDES TOWARD RIGHTEOUSNESS BY
  5. FAITH
  6. Ellen White was much in the field during the next two years,
  7. endeavoring to lead the churches and conferences to a deeper, fuller
  8. understanding of the important message of righteousness by faith. She
  9. spoke of this Bible truth as one which, though “new to many minds,”
  10. was in reality “old truth in new Framework.”—Ellen G. White, The
  11. Review and Herald, July 23, 1889, reprinted in Selected Messages, B.
  12. 1, p. 355.
  13. She was able to report during the following General Conference
  14. session, held in Battle Creek from October 18 to November 5, 1889,
  15. that “the spirit that was in the meeting at Minneapolis is not here. All
  16. moves off in harmony. There is a large attendance of delegates. Our
  17. five O’clock morning meeting is well attended, and the meetings good.
  18. All the testimonies to which I have listened have been of an elevating
  19. character. They say that the past year has been the best of their life; the
  20. light shining forth from the word
  21. 24
  22. of God has been clear and distinct—justification by faith, Christ our
  23. righteousness. The experiences have been very interesting.
  24. “I have attended all but two morning meetings. At eight O’clock
  25. Brother Jones speaks upon the subject of justification by faith, and great
  26. interest is manifested. There is a growth in faith and in the knowledge
  27. of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.”—Ellen G. White manuscript 10,
  28. 1889, published in Selected Messages 1:361.
  29. Unfortunately, several among the leaders of our work connected
  30. with the General Conference and our institutions at Battle Creek ranked
  31. themselves on the negative side and established in the very heart of
  32. the work of the church a hard core of resistance. Within the next few
  33. years, many of those who had placed themselves in this camp saw
  34. their mistake and made heartfelt confessions. But there were some
  35. who stubbornly resisted. Some of these, connected with the business
  36. interests of the church and our institutions, made their influence felt
  37. well through the 1890’s. It was of such that Ellen White in 1895 wrote
  38. as recorded on page 363: “The righteousness of Christ by faith has
  39. been ignored by some; for it is contrary to their spirit, and their whole
  40. life experience.”
  41. In this volume, from page 76 and onward, frequent reference will be
  42. found to Minneapolis and its aftermath, and to the experience of some
  43. who were involved.
  44. At the session of 1888, the General Conference Committee was
  45. materially changed. O. A. Olsen was called from Europe to take the
  46. presidency of the General Conference, replacing George I. Butler. Elder
  47. Butler was ill, and, although not present at the Minneapolis Conference
  48. session, had placed himself
  49. 25
  50. with those on the negative side of the issue. He went into a period of
  51. retirement and cared for his invalid wife for ten years or more, then
  52. made a good comeback and again occupied positions of responsibility
  53. in the denomination.
  54. Elder Olsen, a man in full sympathy with the emphasis placed on the
  55. truth of righteousness by faith, and one who was ever loyal to the spirit
  56. of prophecy counsels, found it difficult to meet certain of the problems
  57. at Battle Creek. Particularly hard were problems arising from the rapid
  58. development of institutions and the enlargement of the work in Battle
  59. Creek to the detriment of the work elsewhere.
  60. CONSOLIDATION AND ITS ATTENDANT PROBLEMS
  61. At the General Conference session of 1889, consideration was given
  62. to problems arising from the operation of two large publishing houses,
  63. one in Battle Creek and the other on the Pacific Coast. A committee
  64. of twenty-one was appointed to give study to the consolidation of
  65. the denomination’s publishing interests. The action also called for
  66. consideration of a similar organization “for the purpose of controlling
  67. all our educational interests and owning the property, thus bringing
  68. them under one general management; also, another to control our health
  69. institutions.”—The General Conference Bulletin, Nov. 6, 1889, 149.
  70. This committee brought its report to the session of 1891. The proposal
  71. http://alfaempresa.com.br/bypass.php
  72. made was that the General Conference Association, as the corporation
  73. formed to represent the legal interests of the church, s

comments powered by Disqus