Best Shared Web Host with Litespeed and LSCache


SUBMITTED BY: Guest

DATE: Aug. 9, 2019, 11:17 p.m.

FORMAT: Text only

SIZE: 11.6 kB

HITS: 387

  1. Best Shared Web Host with Litespeed and LSCache
  2. Hello, I am looking to move to a better shared web host with more responsive support.
  3. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  4. list of top cheapest hosting http://listtop.pw/
  5. Top 200 best traffic exchange sites http://listtop.pw/surf
  6. list of top gpt sites
  7. list of top ptc sites
  8. list of top ptp sites
  9. list of top crypto currency Wallets sites
  10. Listtop.pw
  11. Listtop.pw
  12. Listtop.pw
  13. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  14. I have a wordpress site, with over 20 plugins. It’s a lot of plugins and with that in certainly reduces the time it takes for my site to load. I have my site cached and javascript/css/html optimized but it’s still slow to load.
  15. My budget is $20 a month and my requirements are:
  16. cPanel
  17. Litespeed with LSCache
  18. 5GB Diskspace (SSD or SSD NVMe)
  19. 2 Full CPU Cores
  20. 2GB RAM
  21. 24/7 ticket support
  22. Daily backups
  23. East Coast US datacenter
  24. Cloudflare Railgun a plus but not required
  25. DDos protection a plus
  26. Free migration a plus
  27. CloudLinux a plus
  28. I am extremely happy with Namehero. Been there for nearly two years. Awesome in every way.
  29. CapeWP.com
  30. CapeWP.com - WordPress for all of us
  31. You should find that most hosts will offer LiteSpeed and LSCache these days, it's pretty much industry standard but do always check before buying just in case. You have a good budget, so I don't imagine you'll struggle to find recommendations. It'll just be a matter of choosing the one for you!
  32. Do let us know who you end up going with.
  33. EU/US/UK/AUS/ASIA cPanel Cloud Hosting
  34. cPanel | CloudLinux | LiteSpeed | EU & US Locations | DDoS Protected | SSD Storage | Mailchannels
  35. First & foremost, welcome to Web Hosting Talk!
  36. Unless your current provider aren't using a particularly good setup (i.e. old / slow disk storage, a web server lacking in optimization to get the most out the hardware that's powering it), changing host probably won't help the performance side of things.
  37. Many people and/or companies who develop plugins for software like WordPress simply do not seem to care about code standards or going about things in an efficient way, and simply pull something together that does the job. Keeping this in mind with 20+ plugins installed may be the reason you're suffering. I'd consider doing an audit of your plugins if you haven't already, and removing any that you do not need or do not use, whilst making sure the remainder are up-to-date.
  38. The responsive support side of things is of course another matter completely, though.
  39. I'd advise having a look through this forum and finding a handful of providers that look interesting to you, doing some research on each, asking pre-sales questions, etc.
  40. Ethernet Servers Limited - Est. 2013! - sales@ethernetservers.com
  41. SSD cPanel Web Hosting w/ LiteSpeed, MariaDB, CloudLinux, MultiPHP & JetBackup!
  42. Intel Xeon E5 Virtual Servers w/ KernelCare in NEW JERSEY & LOS ANGELES! (Internap)
  43. Fully Managed cPanel VPS w/ Softaculous, Daily Backups & Pro-Active Monitoring!
  44. Hello, I am looking to move to a better shared web host with more responsive support.
  45. I have a wordpress site, with over 20 plugins. It’s a lot of plugins and with that in certainly reduces the time it takes for my site to load. I have my site cached and javascript/css/html optimized but it’s still slow to load.
  46. My budget is $20 a month and my requirements are:
  47. cPanel
  48. Litespeed with LSCache
  49. 5GB Diskspace (SSD or SSD NVMe)
  50. 2 Full CPU Cores
  51. 2GB RAM
  52. 24/7 ticket support
  53. Daily backups
  54. East Coast US datacenter
  55. Cloudflare Railgun a plus but not required
  56. DDos protection a plus
  57. Free migration a plus
  58. CloudLinux a plus
  59. You need to understand that providers do set some cpu/ram/io limit when it comes to shared hosting. So, you need to ask them these to make sure you have enough resources for your site.
  60. Specially 4 You ||| Elevate Your Sites
  61. .
  62. JoneSolutions.Com ( Jones.Solutions or Jones.Hosting ) is on the net 24/7 providing stable and reliable web hosting solutions and services since 2001
  63. NameHero seems like they check a lot of my boxes. However they charge additional for backups which most web hosts include for free. I don't understand why web hosts charge for backups when storage is so cheap. It really makes me question if they nickel and dime the customer for anything else as well. Too bad.
  64. I am extremely happy with Namehero. Been there for nearly two years. Awesome in every way.
  65. No actually most don't. At least not for shared hosting. Or if they do they provide it for an additional fee per month and not part of the regular hosting fee.
  66. You should find that most hosts will offer LiteSpeed and LSCache these days, it's pretty much industry standard but do always check before buying just in case. You have a good budget, so I don't imagine you'll struggle to find recommendations. It'll just be a matter of choosing the one for you!
  67. Do let us know who you end up going with.
  68. I use a plugin called Query Monitor and P3 Plugin performance profiler, and i found several plugins which were using a lot more resources than normal (wordfence for one). I disabled the plugins, did some speed tests but only saw a nominal improvement in the overall speed. So i'm guessing it could be the network or the server's configuration and not specifically caused by all of my plugins.
  69. [QUOTE=EthernetServers;10112637]First & foremost, welcome to Web Hosting Talk!
  70. Unless your current provider aren't using a particularly good setup (i.e. old / slow disk storage, a web server lacking in optimization to get the most out the hardware that's powering it), changing host probably won't help the performance side of things.
  71. Many people and/or companies who develop plugins for software like WordPress simply do not seem to care about code standards or going about things in an efficient way, and simply pull something together that does the job. Keeping this in mind with 20+ plugins installed may be the reason you're suffering. I'd consider doing an audit of your plugins if you haven't already, and removing any that you do not need or do not use, whilst making sure the remainder are up-to-date.
  72. The responsive support side of things is of course another matter completely, though.
  73. true, im well aware of that.
  74. Quote Originally Posted by net View Post
  75. You need to understand that providers do set some cpu/ram/io limit when it comes to shared hosting. So, you need to ask them these to make sure you have enough resources for your site.
  76. Here is the thing: No host is perfect. So the question becomes, how close to perfect are they? Namehero is darn close. And they do have a (admittedly low) 1 day of backup. I know because I have used it.
  77. CapeWP.com
  78. CapeWP.com - WordPress for all of us
  79. $20/mo is a reasonable budget and LSCache is great in my experience and testing. Just don't buy more up-front than you can stand to lose no matter who the provider is or what their reputation is and see how things go. You can go for a longer term later on if you want to save some money.
  80. Oh - and make sure you keep good off-provider backups no matter who the provider is or what they promise as well. Welcome to
  81. P3 Plugin performance profiler
  82. P3 hasn't worked correctly in at least a year now, and Godaddy quit supporting it before that. It only works if your version of WordPress is really outdated.
  83. LiteSpeed isn't the only way to optimize a server, nor the end-all/be-all method. You can have a quality setup free of LS. LS is just quick/easy/lazy way for hosts, and makes sense for them because they have so many servers to oversee.
  84. @zoomclick You cannot get "2 Full CPU Cores" and 2 GB RAM on a Shared Hosting as all the resource of the underlying server instance are shared between all Shared account holders. When it comes to Shared Hosting, not matter if it is delivered from a Cloud-Based system or from stand-alone server, you'd get the best effort.
  85. The requirement of "Litespeed with LSCache" is unnecassery as any web host might use Nginx for example and you'd still be able to use Lighspeed's caching plugin for WordPress.
  86. PS: As you have listed your requirements they look like you need a virtual server, despite that you have specifically said you wanted Shared Hosting.
  87. Host Color ★ Cloud, Dedicated Hosting & Colocation & Europe Infrastructure Hosting
  88. Data centers ★★ in the U.S. & Europe
  89. Network ★ AS46873 ★★ Level 3, Cogent, Hurricane Electric, Vocus & more
  90. 24/7 Support ★★ 1-574-367-2393; Skype: HostColor
  91. interesting info about P3. i did not know that.
  92. Quote Originally Posted by kpmedia View Post
  93. P3 hasn't worked correctly in at least a year now, and Godaddy quit supporting it before that. It only works if your version of WordPress is really outdated.
  94. LiteSpeed isn't the only way to optimize a server, nor the end-all/be-all method. You can have a quality setup free of LS. LS is just quick/easy/lazy way for hosts, and makes sense for them because they have so many servers to oversee.
  95. OK So with the shared web hosts that have CloudLinux and they tell you the CPU and RAM limits on shared hosting, they are all wrong then and not be believed? So NameHero, and every other web host that is open about their limits they are all lying?
  96. Quote Originally Posted by HostColor View Post
  97. @zoomclick You cannot get "2 Full CPU Cores" and 2 GB RAM on a Shared Hosting as all the resource of the underlying server instance are shared between all Shared account holders. When it comes to Shared Hosting, not matter if it is delivered from a Cloud-Based system or from stand-alone server, you'd get the best effort.
  98. The requirement of "Litespeed with LSCache" is unnecassery as any web host might use Nginx for example and you'd still be able to use Lighspeed's caching plugin for WordPress.
  99. PS: As you have listed your requirements they look like you need a virtual server, despite that you have specifically said you wanted Shared Hosting.
  100. The requirement of "Litespeed with LSCache" is unnecassery as any web host might use Nginx for example and you'd still be able to use Lighspeed's caching plugin for WordPress.
  101. I'm pretty sure this statement is inaccurate unless https://wordpress.org/plugins/litespeed-cache/ isn't up to date with the latest information. You can use their plugin on any server for their general features (Image Optimization, Database Cleaner and Optimizer, Combine CSS/JS etc) but for the caching features such as LSCache you'd need either OpenLiteSpeed or their Commercial Litespeed product.
  102. yes i agree, some features are available without the need for litespeed server, but it's best used if your host has litespeed installed on the server to take full advantage of all the features.
  103. Quote Originally Posted by TonyB View Post
  104. I'm pretty sure this statement is inaccurate unless https://wordpress.org/plugins/litespeed-cache/ isn't up to date with the latest information. You can use their plugin on any server for their general features (Image Optimization, Database Cleaner and Optimizer, Combine CSS/JS etc) but for the caching features such as LSCache you'd need either OpenLiteSpeed or their Commercial Litespeed product.
  105. thanks i ended up choosing Namehero. My websites loading speed increased according to pingdom from 5 seconds to 1.5 seconds.
  106. I am extremely happy with Namehero. Been there for nearly two years. Awesome in every way.
  107. certifiedhosting.com
  108. dream-hits.com
  109. 50adaygetsyoupaid.com
  110. hosting 4gb
  111. 6 ways to make money online
  112. syhjy@ezvib.com
  113. n hostel chiang mai
  114. gr8.cc
  115. freeadswap.com
  116. mythologicalmail.com
  117. claimbit.win
  118. hosting 000

comments powered by Disqus