dsfdsfds


SUBMITTED BY: Guest

DATE: June 1, 2013, 3:02 a.m.

FORMAT: Text only

SIZE: 1.5 kB

HITS: 9909

  1. --19-
  2. sitive verb (VT) or an intransitive verb (VI)), a VT or
  3. VI will be randomly chosen from the specified semantic
  4. class(as) or word(s). Otherwise a VT or VI will be randomly
  5. chosen. In our example the restriction pattern in Fig. 4(a)
  6. specifies that a word should be selected from the word
  7. class VT which is not a member of the semantic e[eeBes
  8. CI, C2, and C3, but is a governor of a word in C16, a
  9. word in word class N. and a word in C19. (Note also that
  10. the sentence should not contain a sentence adverb.)
  11. There are 16 candidates which satisfy the restrictions.
  12. They are shown in Fig. 4(b) by their addresses, at which
  13. word numbers are stored. A random number is generated in
  14. the range i to 16, for example, 8. Thus the eighth VT is
  15. chosen: word number 3336 whose address is 531.
  16. b. The possible dependent types of a VT are NS
  17. (noun subject), NO (noun object), DV (adverb), and DS
  18. (sentence adverb). The probabilities (in percentages) for
  19. the word 3336 to govern words of these dependent types
  20. are, say, 65, i00, 35, and 40 respectively. The procedure
  21. RELATOR is called in order to determine whether the selec-
  22. tion of each dependent type agrees with the restriction
  23. pattern. If the selection of a dependent type conflicts
  24. with the pattern, the dependent type is ignored, i.e., no
  25. word will be selected from this dependent type as the
  26. dependent of the verb 3336. In our example, NS, NO, and
  27. DV have passed this test.

comments powered by Disqus