After the conversation raised by the clarification of the Egyptian writer Ahmed Murad about the differentiation between a story and a novel, a large number of reactions spread that helped out what was communicated in his declaration, which incited us to make an article through which we research the authenticity of what was communicated and the reasons behind the examples of conflict raised by the subject.
On the possibility of story and novel as demonstrated by Ahmed Murad:
During a gathering on one of the television programs, the Egyptian essayist who formed the book "The Blue Elephant" referred to that the qualification between a story and a novel is that the last choice perseveres through lies as well as truth, since it is depicted, and a while later the narrator could give extraordinary nuances to attract the thought of the crowd individuals, but in fact This suggests that the story is legitimate and doesn't contain lies, since the story of a story truly exists.
Honestly, this clarification contains various double dealings that can't be relied on, as the differentiations referred to by the writer don't exactly spread out the characteristics of these two kinds of record composing. This is the very thing that we attempt to detail in the going with.
What is the differentiation between a story and a book?
It very well may be all in all correct to say that we said that the principal differentiation between the novel and the story generally is the difference between their size and the amount of words, as the novel is greater in size, while the record style in the story doesn't take up a ton of words - so to speak - as it is common something like 30,000 words.
Regardless, is satisfactorily this to get a handle on the qualification between them? Furthermore, the advancement of by and large short, thick books? Are there exceptional methodologies planned for the creative sort alone, or are there complex associations that make the issue of objective family member?
Thus, it will be important to go over the significance of both the novel and the story freely, and a while later separate the differentiation between them from a significant fundamental and insightful perspective.
First: Importance of the book:
The Novel is described as an insightful kind that has a spot with stories, and is depicted by being a boring tale that relies upon confusing significant nuances, across parts and a tolerably enormous size of words.
The novel moreover relies upon different characters, trade, and laced events, inside a time period going from several hours to various years, true to form by the possibility of the events and the story complex to determine express issues. Consequently, the first separates as shown by its focuses to:
The symbolic book: It relies upon the delegate viewpoint in implying the significance, as it doesn't address the focuses directly or things being what they are, yet rather presents the issues inside a kind of puzzles and unclearness, so the ramifications come as a mysterious that requires significance from the peruser and a broad culture that enables him to unwind them.
Dream novel: a fantasy novel relies upon presenting ludicrous stories and drawing in great events solicitation to present philosophical perceptions about presence.
Specialist novel: a smart game plans with human issues through the purposes of bad behavior and legal assessments, and it is much of the time depicted by speed increment of events, mystery, and pressure. Regardless, this doesn't infer that it is just a shallow show. Rather, various bad behavior books raise huge focuses about presence, man, moral inward voice, and other essential issues.
Irrefutable book: It is a unique considering a story transmitting from evident events and real factors, through which the writer attempts to raise issues about the past and the present, and to interface the causes to the issues he wishes to examine.
The sincere book: when in doubt, the genuine novel presents a story about human selves and their relationship with the universe. It isn't just about heartfelt stories, yet feeling recalls human associations for general, even those that interface him to nature. However, this doesn't dismiss that an enormous piece of such books interface with stories between two dears and screen their feelings and nuances.
The down to earth book: The reasonable novel decides its plot and characters from this present reality, and we don't mean here that the events have truly occurred, yet rather it reproduces the nuances of society, its issues and nuances start to finish and things being what they are, thusly making some separation from imaginative psyche, wonder, and dream.
There are various types of books, similar to the sensational novel, the smart that relies upon reasonable profound portrayal, and various sorts.
It should be seen that the novel could have two particular sorts all the while. The writer mixes validness and feeling, or among expert and the marvelous, and various undertakings at experimentation that essayists keep on practicing in the midst of their works.
ٱ: Characteristics of the novel:Although savants have endeavored to describe the characteristics that perceive a made up work from other insightful works, through tries to decide a lot of notable points of view between books throughout composing, these traits stay subject to consistent endlessly change, as confirmed by the most well-known approach to portraying and gathering dynamic sorts.
Anyway, no matter what this, with respect to the novel, the going with characteristics can be perceived:
Imaginary works depend upon a story depiction of components, characters, places, as well as events and their perspectives in the close to home setting. <a href="https://www.eloualid-book.com/book/%D9%81%D9%8A-%D9%82%D9%84%D8%A8%D9%8A-%D8%A3%D9%86%D8%AB%D9%89-%D8%B9%D8%A8%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%A9">في قلبي أنثى عبرية</a>
When in doubt, the clever depends upon the interconnection and repeat of events inside a plan.
