Untitled


SUBMITTED BY: sarmadkhalid45

DATE: Dec. 18, 2017, 9:44 a.m.

FORMAT: Text only

SIZE: 2.1 kB

HITS: 928

  1. A family business, when incorporated as a company, is an example of a private limited company. This means that the shares
  2. are privately held and are not available for members of the investing public to buy and sell. This is in contrast to a public
  3. company, which is listed on a stock exchange and in which members of the public, including private and institutional
  4. shareholders, can purchase or sell shares. Being a public listed or public limited company carries a number of requirements,
  5. imposed either by statute or the stock exchange, which do not apply to private companies. These requirements include
  6. compliance with a number of corporate governance provisions which include the adoption of certain governance structures,
  7. adherence with internal control and internal audit standards, and the external reporting of some types of information. A private
  8. limited company, in contrast, must comply with company law and tax regulations, but is not subject to listing rules.
  9. Mr Mara’s behaviour was highly unethical and also illegal, given the regulatory regime controlling surgical supplies in the
  10. country in which he was based. His abuse of his office as CEO of Lysus was made possible by a number of failures, linked
  11. in part to the nature and culture of the company.
  12. The first such factor was the ‘tight-knit’ family culture which enabled the decision to be made and then go unchallenged
  13. among the senior management including his wife, brother and Amy Tsang. The unwillingness to appoint from outside meant
  14. that senior members of the company became familiar with Mr Mara’s management style and may, over time, have come to
  15. consider his behaviour as ‘normal’. The fact that Mr Mara was such a domineering figure may have become accepted rather
  16. than challenged by other directors, partly because of family ties and their prior knowledge of his character and management
  17. style. The fact that the company was family-dominated may have made it difficult for others to confront Mr Mara about his
  18. style as such an approach may have negatively affected family relationships.

comments powered by Disqus