katran1290


SUBMITTED BY: katran1290

DATE: July 11, 2021, 6:11 a.m.

FORMAT: Text only

SIZE: 6.0 kB

HITS: 444

  1. We do not support carding! This is for educational purposes only – and reflect the author’s
  2. own experience and views only.
  3. At the time of this story, I was new to carding. Saying that I was “new” is a bit of an
  4. understatement. I had never used any Darknet markets, and I had barely any experience
  5. with Bitcoin. I had a lot to learn. This was my experience.
  6. There are currently few major carding forums such as – Tor Carding Forums (TCF) and
  7. Rescator for example. Since Tor Carding Forums had a fee for registration, I decided to use
  8. Rescator. The website requires an account to access any listings or to make purchases, but
  9. it does not require any payment for registration.
  10. There are two things that are unique about Rescator: first, it is centralized. As the rumor
  11. goes, Rescator was a reputable user from a now-defunct Russian forum. After this forum
  12. was infiltrated by law enforcement, he decided to open his own dedicated shop. Many of the
  13. recent security breaches, including Target and J.P. Morgan, can be traced back to a small
  14. group of people who include Rescator. Second, there is no escrow system. Once you
  15. release funds, there is very little you can dispute. The site’s only dispute resolution is in the
  16. form of tickets. I had to put a lot of trust in a single person.
  17. There is also some terminology that is pretty exclusively used on carding forums. “Dumps”
  18. are the collections of data that are being sold. These are exactly what they sound like –
  19. disorganized dumps of all data that was collected. A “base” is a collection of dumps that
  20. were all skimmed from the same source. The data from the Target hack would be a base,
  21. while the data from the Home Depot hack would be another base. The names of these
  22. bases vary, ranging from names like, “Ronald Reagan” to “Beaver Cage”. The amount of
  23. data that you can expect to still be usable and valid is called the “validity rate”.
  24. In order to purchase a dump, I had to transfer money into an on-site account. This is where
  25. Bitcoin came into the picture. I decided not to tumble my Bitcoins. Many people advocate
  26. that you must tumble your Bitcoins. The issue, however, is that tumbling Bitcoins does not
  27. make them impossible to trace – it just makes them difficult to trace. This is what we call,
  28. “security through obscurity”.
  29. I decided that, to be safe, I had to make my Bitcoins impossible to trace. Here was my plan:
  30. All Bitcoin transactions are publicly recorded on the blockchain. As long as you are trading
  31. on the blockchain, all transactions are connected. Therefore, I had to break the chain of
  32. transactions. To do this, I used a normal Bitcoin exchange.
  33. I converted my Bitcoin to Litecoin, then back into Bitcoin.
  34. The act of purchasing was fairly straightforward. The website itself was very user-friendly.
  35. There was a basic filter that could be used to sort by base, country of origin, type of card,
  36. among other criteria. When I decided on the card information I wanted to purchase, I added
  37. it to my cart. At this point, in order to release funds and receive the dump, I simply clicked a
  38. “purchase” button.
  39. From the time a base is released, the validity rate will gradually decrease. After a security
  40. breach is discovered, companies and account holders begin to close accounts, and the data
  41. quickly becomes useless. Therefore, I chose a recent base: American Sanctions,
  42. information collected during the recent Home Depot breach.
  43. This is what I got once I received my order. This, at first, was a bit confusing.
  44. Here’s how card technology works: There are two to three tracks on the magnetic strip of a
  45. credit or debit card. Track 3 is sometimes not even present on cards, and most major
  46. networks only use tracks 1 and 2.
  47. This is the format for Track 1: account number^Lastname/Firstname^expiration
  48. date(YY/MM)::bank key(3 numbers)::discretionary data or security key(in this case it was a
  49. CVC code – 3 numbers)::Longitudinal Redundancy Check.
  50. This is the format for Track 2:
  51. account number=expiration date(YY/MM)::service code(3 numbers)::discretionary data or
  52. security key (3 numbers)::Longitudinal Redundancy Check
  53. A lot of the information from Track 1 is repeated on Track 2.
  54. Now we can make my example meaningful:
  55. Lets divide Track 1:
  56. 4631588xxxxx//<lastname>,<firstname>.//1601//101//163//03100495000000
  57. Our primary account number is: 4631588xxxxx
  58. Our account holder is: <lastname><firstname>
  59. Our Expiration date is: 01/16
  60. Our service code is: 101
  61. Our CVC code is: 163
  62. Once I had organized this information, it became a matter of cashing out the card.
  63. The difficulty of actually using this information is figuring out how to use it anonymously. I
  64. decided that once again, I would turn to Bitcoin. There are several things a website asks
  65. you for when you use a debit or credit card: the primary account number, the expiration
  66. date, and the security (CVC) code.
  67. Since all of this was included in the dump, I could use the card online without any problems.
  68. I decided to purchase gift cards, which I would then sell for Bitcoins. After doing my Bitcoin
  69. > Litecoin > Bitcoin tumbling scheme mentioned earlier, I could deposit these into my wallet.
  70. However, I never got that far. My plan would have been successful…had the card holder’s
  71. account not been closed.
  72. Overall, my experience was very positive. At first, I was just happy that I hadn’t gotten scammed;
  73. and after banging my head over my desk a few times, I ended up not being too upset over the
  74. card’s failure. After all, if I had purchased a card with an option for a refund, I would have been
  75. successful. Using the information, while an extensive process, was definitely doable. It worked very
  76. much like any market, with many helpful and honest members.. The people involved were not just
  77. criminals looking for easy money; they were interested in the technology and were more than
  78. willing to help me. The carding community was just as diverse as any community, and I discovered it
  79. was just as tight knit.

comments powered by Disqus