The recent Vanity Fair detailing the more lurid underbelly of online dating—the barrage of dick pics, the endless swiping, the death of romance—was grim, if not horrific. More and more women I know are dating men twice, yes twice, their age. My friend Gabrielle met her boyfriend at a restaurant opening. Child-bearing and rearing becomes complicated, not to mention the potential for earlier onset of age-related medical challenges, as well as confronting constant social stigma. In fact, when asked his position on slicing, dicing babies and selling their organs, he refuses to answer. So, yeah, he explicitly favors prostitution. He has no problem with women dancing on poles. Look him up on Google. Easy enough to check. In fact, when asked his position on slicing, dicing babies and selling their organs, he refuses to answer. So, yeah, he explicitly favors prostitution. He has no problem with women dancing on poles. Look him up on Google. Easy enough to check. You remarked that women hooking up with older men is not new, and then quoted a well-known blogger whose ethics resembles that of a pig for support of your remark. I pointed out that the person you quoted to support your remark has the ethics of a pig. Then you trolled my remark. Dicing babies and selling their organs is what the blogger supports. He also supports legal prostitution. Libertarianism has all the intellectual force of a teenager. He has been asked on numerous occasions to make a public statement. He is on record supporting 1 legal abortion — in fact, he claims he is one of the few lawyers who thinks RvW was CORRECTLY decided, 2 organ sales. Thus, he can have no logical objection to slicing and dicing babies and selling their organs. By invoking it, you force your morality, your idea of what constitutes proper behaviour, on to someone else. If you really believe in individual liberty, why should ANYONE accept that your rule is valid? Some do both, but the vast majority do not. I will assume you are referencing Instapundit, aka Glenn Reynolds, the law professor. He is also one of the most respected law professors and Constitutional scholars in the country. Reynolds, we libertarians have this shocking notion that a person should be in control of their own body. If the Professor were not happily married to beautiful and accomplished woman, he would be the kind of guy a smart Millennial female would be drawn to like a moth to a flame. If you control your own body, then stop getting old. And what we do with our bodies — burglary, theft, rape, assault, murder — certainly should be subject to the law. But, immaturity has a strong draw, which is why libertarians rally around libertarianism like moths to a flame. According to YOU, YES! So, according to you, the United States was WRONG to outlaw slavery because I should have the right to sell myself as a slave if I wanted. In fact, many southern blacks did exactly that, to pay off family debts. So, you see nothing wrong with that! What wonderful logical consistency! It is apparent you have convinced yourself by repeating the same thing over and ov
