Cheaper, smaller, what you lose in bokeh with the f1. I swear it looked like it was currently available, but I didnt take a screen shot. Maybe I caught it before they added the preorder language, nah, probably just my hopes overrode my reading comprehension. I swear it looked like it was currently available, but I didnt take a screen shot. Maybe I caught it before they added the preorder language. Hey when it comes to looking at new gear we are interested in , we cant wait to see reviews. Cheaper, smaller, what you lose in bokeh with the f1. Cheaper, smaller, what you lose in bokeh with the f1. If size matters then the Zeiss 55mm is no brainer but honestly having tried both optically the Art blows it out of the water. I personally would go with the 55mm but understand the Sigma choise for those looking at this and the 50 1. Cheaper, smaller, what you lose in bokeh with the f1. Well, if the ART 1. This is why I want to read reviews to see how sharp it is at various focal lengths, especially 1. In my photography, I usually use max or a rather small aperture, so if I am shooting a 1. For me, the reason to use primes over zooms is speed. The bokeh is a useful bonus -- I am not a sports or modeling photographer. Yes, if it is a lens I want to take hiking, then I will start counting the grams. Cheaper, smaller, what you lose in bokeh with the f1. Well, if the ART 1. This is why I want to read reviews to see how sharp it is at various focal lengths, especially 1. In my photography, I usually use max or a rather small aperture, so if I am shooting a 1. For me, the reason to use primes over zooms is speed. The bokeh is a useful bonus -- I am not a sports or modeling photographer. Yes, if it is a lens I want to take hiking, then I will start counting the grams. I know what u mean... I'm trying to like the sigma 50 too. Maybe I'll try it.. I'll follow this and see what u decide lol. I'll have to checkout more examples and reviews.