This page is for general discussion about. Any such comments or. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about at the , discuss relevant Wikipedia policy at the , or ask for help at the. Bad Girls Club has been listed as one of the under the. If you can improve it further,. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can it. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can. To improve this article, please refer to the for the type of work. This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's. This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's. I countless additions of , and statements and unverifiable last names of the contestants on this show. However, it was by ·. The article is as of now not a like it. As the nominator who helped it achieve GA status, I would like to revert the undue weight here on this article added by vandalizing fans of the show. If the article stays as it is, it may be. Best, 14:28, May 27, 2013 UTC Thank you for taking the issue here to discuss; however, please do not refer to countless good faith edits of countless editors in the last four months as all being vandalism just because you may disagree with it. Keep in mind that GA status article, while an opinion in high regard, is all still just an opinion. Moreover, GA status versions can fall out of date. Apparently numerous other editors in the last 4 or 5 months, myself included, thought there were needed revisions to that version. Quite frankly, I thought the version you rolled it back to was not GA status. Rebellious and mischievous, more accurate descriptions of a disobedient child, hardly describes the bad girls. Mischievous you might be able to get away with as a supplementary description for some of their sexual antics, but the bad girls are full-on aggressive, quarrelsome, and unruly girls. They are constantly engaged in violence. In fact, every season by the reunion special, the finalists brag to lasting in the house despite all of their hostilities and violence. By the way, you complained of lack of sourcing to the new version. While there was a source in front of it, it was misleading. This was the source used in your version and it states nothing about rebellious and mischievous:. As yet another problem with your old version, there's a lot of information as provided that's now out of date and no longer even applicable. For example, your version reads: They try to cope with one another and change their promiscuous behavior to become role models for young women. Some cast members try to accomplish specific goals. But that is not what the show is about any more. Anyone who watches the show knows that these girls are anything but role models and are not trying to be when there's violence and ambushing in practically every episode. The most previous season ended with a girl getting jumped and everyone saying vile things about her when she left the house. This might have been the case in early seasons, but it's simply info that's now out of date and needed the updates that were provided in the last 4 months by the slews of editors. Everyone, including the GA reviewer, has the right to discuss improvements for this article. Secondly, I didn't say all of them were in bad faith let's not get into the number of times the article was protected since its passing of GA status. In fact, the majority of those edits were minor ones fixing grammatical errors which I encourage, however, according to the article's edit history it has been brought to my attention that several users and IPs have engaged in and problems are among those few. The revision I reverted to and updated it per , were accepted reliable sources and offline sources accepted from the GA reviewer User:Titodutta and the member. I simply removed content such as the last name of the many unsourced cast members per and sources that were not claimed to a ref to those unreliable ones such as blogs and YouTube videos which are generally discouraged. The rebellious claim are in fact sourced, per the lead section does not acquire sources for claims that are most likely never to be challenged by users. Another thing, just because it is out of date which many FAC, GAN and PR reviewers dislike doesn't mean it is no longer valid. You are and have taken upon yourself to remove it and replace with an unsourced claim. Unless there are sources to back up the claim that the show is no longer a way to achieve goals and become role models, then the GA-accepted source would remain intact or removed by consensus. Lastly, we need to come up with a decision to fix this article before it falls to. Best, 23:47, May 29, 2013 UTC As an uninvolved editor who received the RfC, I'm more than willing to offer my input on this, and, as a Wikipedia editor, I know that I need to thoroughly look through the history before rendering an opinion; however, if both sides could please send me some diffs demonstrating the alleged vandalism or good faith reverts and their respective opinions on it, that might expedite the process - it looks like this dispute goes back a ways and that you are at risk of falling to. As an editor, I'm not real satisfied with that, because an obituary would at least confirm age and maybe some other public details. We really don't even have an exact date of death, just the date that it was reported. I think that we could safely edit something like reported deceased , with a cite or ref to a reliable source article-- of which there are many , and leave it at that. I know that we don't usually require primary sources or death-certificates, or even obituaries per-se, but something is weird here. Also-the ages are pretty ridiculous for ALL of these women. The page went into lockdown because 1 there's a user who keeps vandalizing it and 2 people kept adding the death without any references. Please 02:12, 5 April 2015 UTC You are very welcome. I guess that death always has to be referenced really unless they are over a hundred and fifty lol. In this case, death is being reported and the page has seen an increase in visitors, some of who I am sure are editors checking to see if the info. I am beginning to regret ever doing so as it continues to be the prime suspect of vandalism by IPs and on Bad Girls Club articles. This table, though fails , was based on another subgenre of television such as game shows, whereas Bad Girls Club is a reality television show not based on competitive challenges. Since its introduction the table used in Bad Girls Club have been duplicated into other non-game shows such as. Best, 16:11, 30 June 2015 UTC The 16th and 17th installments of the series have been confirmed by Oxygen via television promos. The 16th season is called Social Disruption and will premier in September of 2016. The 17th installment will be an East Coast vs. West Coast installment and is still in the casting process. This information should be added to the main page for Bad Girls Club. Literally we know all the girls names and stuff and it comes out in less than a month, there should be a page for it. There was and then someone deleted it. It literally premieres in 2 weeks. The casting special is next week. Quit making a page and then delete it. There needs to be a page for it. At the moment the only information available is a cast list. When the episode table can be created, a season article can be created at , not or. There are promos everywhere and the casting special premieres in 3 days and the first episode premieres in 10 days. There has always been a page for a new season probably a month before the actual season has aired. Now we are 3 days away and there's still no page. I suggest you read , especially the and. Subjects require discussion in. We can't just create articles willy nilly. At the moment the only source that has been presented is one listing the cast. That alone is not sufficient justification to create an article, as already stated. Also as stated above, the minimum requirement for a season article is a sourced episode list. At the moment the only information available is a cast list. When the episode table can be created, a season article can be created at. Can you create a sourced episode table? If so, then create a draft at and submit it for creation. If it's suitable for moving to article space, can be unprotected and the draft moved there. It's really that simple. So why is it hidden, and why can I only get to the page from the link you just gave me. I think it deserves to be out and open. Please take a moment to review. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit for additional information. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than using the archive tool instructions below. This message is updated dynamically through the template last update: 15 July 2018. Please take a moment to review. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit for additional information. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than using the archive tool instructions below. This message is updated dynamically through the template last update: 15 July 2018.
