https://bit.ly/3oxpRBU
https://bit.ly/3pzdiWb
https://bit.ly/3rK21VG
https://bit.ly/3pBECDa
https://bit.ly/3rGvf7F
https://bit.ly/3dureLq
https://bit.ly/3osRbBk
https://bit.ly/3DxGf9J
https://bit.ly/31u4clB
https://bit.ly/3oxpXJM
https://bit.ly/303BPd3
Response
Dear Pat,
This is a fair enough comment. Probably bringing up the Disciplinary Wives Club was a mistake. I should have spoken of the Spencer Plan instead.
Again,since it seems so matter so very, very much then again I was wrong in the way I phrased my comments.
Yours,
Carrie
by a Taken In Hand reader on 2006 Aug 1 - 08:00 | reply to this comment
Response
I am sorry, I don't know your name. You address yourself as taken in hand so I will use that also.
This is getting a bit repetitive. As for your basic comment, please see my comment to Lex. Again, the Spencer Plan would have been a better choice. I honestly never intended to start the screeds that developed. My own opinion, I'm sure many couples are here intentionally. However, isn't there just the slightest possibility that some start out here simply because let's face it we have been traditionally socialized that there is something wrong [and maybe Communistic!] about any relationship where men are not dominant and women not submissive. And that's what I meant when I mentioned the Disciplinary Wives Club, I mentioned it as an alternative [obviously too strongly for your taste admittedly] and that was all. Your own site suggests that individuals sometimes fight against their own natures and I didn't see anything wrong with individuals reassessing their priorities.
Respecfully,
Carrie
by a Taken In Hand reader on 2006 Aug 1 - 08:35 | reply to this comment
Response
My Dear Carl:
